Author, date and country | Patient group | Study type (level of evidence) | Outcomes | Key results | Study Weaknesses |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Burton MJ, Towler B, Glasziou P April 1999 UK | The search stategy included Cochrane,Medline and Embase, which were searched for RCT's and controlled clinical trials. Quality was assessed and data extracted and analysed blindly by 2 reviewers. 6 studies were identified which included children. 5 of these were RCT's however in 3 of these the either all the surgical patients or an unknown number underwent adeno-tonsillectomy. This may affect the tendency to have sore throats after the operation | systematic review of high quality RCT's | Is antibiotic prescription or surgical intervention more effective? | No results presented. The studies assessed were of insufficient quality to draw conclusions. | This systematic review was essentially negative. However it is important to know that no high quality trials have been carried out. |
Stafford N, von Haacke N, Sene A 1986 UK | 40 patients referred to ENT by their GP's were included provided they were; age 16 years or over, had a history of at least 4 severe episodes of tonsillitis per year for at least 2 years and good health between attacks. A normal FBC and negative Paul Bunnel test. Group 1. 20 patients underwent tonsillectomy and were reviewed at 6 months, 1 yr and 18 months post-op. Group 2 were treated with 8 day courses of antibiotics for each episode of tonsillitis over the year. Patients were reviewed every 3 months and GP's returned questionaires each time the patient was seen. | Randomised controlled trial | Tonsillectomy patients who felt 'cured' | 18/20 (p=0.05) | The study had a high risk of bias. Very small study, with only 40 patients. There was some baseline differences between the 2 groups. Females were over represented with 17/20 in group 1 and 14/20 in group 2. Also group 1 patients had an average of 6 episodes of tonsillitis per year whereas group 2 had an average of 5. The measurement of outcome is not assessed by the subsequent number of throat infections but by whether the patient felt cured. This may make the outcome measure invalid and unreliable. The patients and assessors were unable to be blinded.No side effects were reported. |
non-surgical patients who felt 'cured' | 14/20 (p=0.05) | ||||
Marshall T 1998 UK | 5 studies were found which met the inclusion criteria:participants had suffered from recurrent throat infections, the experimental intervention was tonsillectomy or adenotonsillectomy and the study was randomised with control groups. 4 of these were published, 1 was published only as an abstract but the data was made available to the author | systematic review of RCT's | Mean reduction in annual incidence of throat infections avoided as a result of tonsillectomy year 1 | 1.9,1.6,1.6,1.7, 1.5 | The author concludes there was little evidence found. The data was not analysed for statistical significance. The entry criteria into the studies included was varied or unclear. Together the studies included less than 350 patients. The patients were presenting to GP's not A&E this makes it less applicable to the A&E setting. Although the number of throat infections post op is relevant to my question, this needs to be balanced against the morbidity of the operation wich this review doesnt address. |
year 2 | 1.1,1.1,0.7,1.6,0.8 | ||||
annual incidence of throat infections tonsillectomy vs control | 1.24 vs 3.09, 1.45 vs 3.01, 0.36 vs 1.96, 0.56 vs 2.25, 0.64 vs 2.15 no p values |