Author, date and country | Patient group | Study type (level of evidence) | Outcomes | Key results | Study Weaknesses |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Simon RR and Wolgin M, 1987, USA | 47 consecutive patients presenting to an emergency department with subungual haematoma > 25% nail bed. +/- fracture of distal phalanx Digital block, nail removed and lacerations of nail bed greater than 2-3 mm repaired using vicryl and nail replaced | Prospective observational study | Association of SUH size and repairable laceration | 16/27 patients with haematoma >50% had nail bed laceration requiring repair | Often quoted paper but no follow up of patients and no control group |
Seaberg DC et al, 1991, USA | 48 patients presenting to an emergency department with subungual haematoma Nail and nail margin intact. +/- distal phalanx fracture Electrocautery nail trephination Follow up at least 6/12 | Prospective observational study | Pain relief, infection and cosmetic appearance | 94% follow up. All reported a reduction in pain. No infective complications or major nail deformaties regardless of SUH size or fracture | Major nail deformaties not clearly defined No control group |
Meeks S and White M, 1997, UK | 123 patients presenting to emergency departments treated by simple trephining 94 followed up for 5-13 months | Retrospective | Functional and cosmetic appearances | Excellent ie no residual abnormality or very good in 85% of those followed up. 2% poor outcome caused by nail splitting. Major nail abnormality defined by Zook's criteria occured in 11% | Retrospective Coding inadequate No control group Loss of patients to FU |
Infection | Infection in 5 patients. No correlation between adverse outcome and haematoma size, presence of fracture or infection | ||||
Roser SE and Gellman H, 1999, USA | 53 finger injuries in children with intact nail and nail margin, +/- tuft fracture. Formal nail bed repair v simple trephining/ conservative. FU at least 4/12 | Sequential study | Cosmetic deformity of nail and functional deficit | Operative and non-operative- nil at long term FU | No randomisation |
Infective complications | No infective complications in either group | ||||
Costs | Costs significantly higher in operative group |