Author, date and country | Patient group | Study type (level of evidence) | Outcomes | Key results | Study Weaknesses |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Reeves et al, 2002 | 107 children, age 1 month to 22 years who presented to an ED who had experienced at least three episodes of vomiting in the previous 24 hours thought to be secondary to an acute gastroenteritis and required intravenous fluids. Patients were excluded if they had received any antiemetic therapy within 72 hours of enrolment, had a history of hepatic disease or had diarrhoea lasting more than 7 days. Ondansetron 0.15 mg/kg IV was given as a single dose | Double blind RCT | Primary outcomes: frequency of vomiting episodes after drug administration, and the need for hospitalisation Secondary outcomes: duration of vomiting after drug administration, number and duration of diarrhoea symptoms, frequency of return visits to an urgent or emergency care centre, need for readministration of intravenous fluids, and need for later hospital admission | 38 (70%) of the 54 patients in the group who received ondansetron and 27 (51%) in the group that received placebo had complete cessation of vomiting (p = 0.04) Fourteen patients (26%) who received ondansetron and 16 patients (30%) who received placebo were hospitalised (p>0.05) | The study was supported by a grant from Glaxo Wellcome Inc. who manufacture ondansetron No testing was done to determine the cause of gastroenteritis. In a subgroup analysis excluding patients who had serum CO2 <14 mEq/l or had previously received intravenous hydration, 3 of 43 (7.5%) patients who received ondansetron and 11 of 47 (23%) who received placebo required hospitalisation (p = 0.04) |
Ramsook et al, 2002 | 145 children ages 6 months to 12 years who presented to an ED due to with or without diarrhoea thought be secondary to gastroenteritis and had vomited at least five times during the preceding 24 hours and had not received any antiemetics. Patients were excluded if they had any chronic illnesses, possible appendicitis, urinary tract infection, or, severe gastroenteritis requiring immediate intravenous fluid resuscitation. Ondansetron syrup was given every eight hours for up to two days. Children 6 months to 1 year of age were given 1.6 mg/dose, children 1 to 3 years of age were given 3.2 mg/dose and children 4 to 12 years of age were given 4 mg/dose. Oral rehydration was initiated 15 minutes after the first dose of ondansetron or placebo | Double blind RCT | Primary outcomes: frequency of emesis during the 48 hours after enrolment and rates of intravenous fluid administration Secondary outcomes: hospital admission rates and frequency of diarrhoea | The rank sum of vomiting episodes while in the ED was significantly lower in the group who received ondansetron (p = 0.001). During the 48 hours of follow up, the median number of episodes of vomiting were not significantly different in the two groups. A lower proportion of patients receiving ondansetron required intravenous fluids (p = 0.015). The admission rate was lower in the patients receiving ondansetron (p = 0.007) Children receiving ondansetron had significantly more diarrhoea in the 48 hour follow up period than did controls The children who received ondansetron were more likely to return to the ED than were controls (p = 0.047) | The study was supported in part by a grant from GlaxoWellcome Research and Development who manufacture ondansetron. The majority of children studied were less than 4 years of age No testing was done to determine the cause of gastroenteritis 120 children were available for follow up at 24 hours and 113 were available for follow up at 48 hours |
Cubeddu et al, 1997 | 36 children ages 6 months to 8 years diagnosed with acute gastroenteritis with associated vomiting who had vomited twice within one hour. Patients were excluded if they were severely dehydrated, had a rectal temperature greater than 39°C, had experienced seizures, or had received any parenteral antiemetic medication in the six hours prior to the study. Ondansetron 0.3 mg/kg, metoclopramide 0.3 mg/kg, or sterile saline were given as a single IV infusion. Oral rehydration was commenced 30 minutes after treatment administration | Double blind RCT | Frequency of vomiting over the 24 hours after treatment | The number of vomiting episodes was significantly less in the children who received ondansetron (mean = 2) than in controls (mean = 5). There was no statistically significant difference between children treated with metoclopramide or placebo 58% of children who received ondansetron experienced no vomiting as compared to 17% of controls. There was no statistically significant difference between children treated with metoclopramide or placebo Over 24 hours, the number of treatment failures was significantly greater in the children treated placebo (33%) and metoclopramide (42%) than in children treated with ondansetron (17%) Children receiving both metoclopramide and ondansetron experienced more episodes of diarrhea than controls over the 24 hours study period (p = 0.013 and 0.004 respectively) | The study was supported by Glaxo Wellcome Research and Development who manufacture ondansetron. 47% of children enrolled had rotavirus enteritis, 11% had adenovirus enteritis, and 31% had bacterial enteritis. All 36 children completed the study. At entry, children in the placebo group were somewhat better hydrated and somewhat older than children in both treatment groups There was no difference in the number or type of adverse events in the three groups |
Van Egan et al, 1979 | 60 children ages 2 to 6 years admitted to the hospital with acute gastroenteritis with vomiting. No exclusionary criteria were mentioned. A suppository containing placebo, 30 mg of domperidone, or 10 mg of metoclopramide was given at study entry and up to three more times as clinically warranted over the 24 hour study period | Double blind RCT | Primary outcome was severity of nausea, vomiting, anorexia, abdominal pain, and abdominal distension as rated on a four point Likert scale Secondary outcome was global rating of symptoms at 24 hours | Children receiving domperidone required fewer additional suppositories than children who received metoclopramide (p<0.05) or placebo (p<0.05) The time span between suppositories was longer in children receiving domperidone than children receiving metoclopramide (p<0.01) or placebo (p<0.05) Children treated with domperidone had significantly less nausea, vomiting, anorexia and abdominal pain than children treated with metoclopramide or placebo | No testing was done to determine the cause of gastroenteritis. All 60 children completed the trial No drug-related side effects were identified |