Author, date and country | Patient group | Study type (level of evidence) | Outcomes | Key results | Study Weaknesses |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Kumar et al 2004 new Zealand | 72 patients with biliary colic treated with IM 75 mg diclofenac (n=36) or buscopan 25 mg IM (n=36) | Prospective double blind study. | Complete pain relief at 4h | Diclofenac 91.7% vs. buscopan 69.4%. p=0.037 | Small number of patients involved |
Progression to cholecystitis in 72h | Diclofenac 16.66% vs. buscopan 52.77%. p=0.003 | ||||
G. Schmieder, G. Stankov, G. Zerle, S. Schnitzel and K. Brune 1993 Germany | 74 patients with biliary colic treated with metimazole 2.5mg IV (n=25), tramadol 100mg IV (n=25) or buscopan 20 mg IV (n=24.) | Multicentre, observer blind, parallel group study. | Onset of pain relief | Metimazole 10.9 (+/- 5.8 minutes); tramadol: 15.8 (+/-11.7 minutes); buscopan: 25.6 (+/- 24.3 minutes.) Metimazole vs. tramadol: p-value insigificant. Metimazole vs. buscopan: p-value<0.037. | Small number patients involved. Overall assessment of pain relief during the whole period of observation was not adequately quantified or assessed. |
Overall assessment of treatement efficacy | Metimazole was the most effective drug (p=0.004) | ||||
N. Al-Awaili and K.Y. Saloom 1998 U.A.E. | 32 patients with biliary colic treated with tenoxicam 20mg IV (n=16) or buscopan 20mg IV (n=16). | Prospective double blind study | Pain relief at 30 minutes using a five point score | Tenoxicam: 10 out of 16 patients had significant pain relief (P<0.005). Buscopan: 7 out of 16 paitents had significant pain relief (p<0.05). Difference between both drugs: insignificant. | Small number of patients involved. Tenoxicam is not a widely used analgesic. Although stating that tenoxicam is significantly more effective than buscopan in preventing relapse of pain and progression to chlecystitis no p-value was given. |
Pain relief at 60 minutes using a five point score | Tenoxicam 14 out of 16 patients had significant pain relief (p<0.005). Buscopan: 10 out of 16 patients had significant pain relief (p<0.005). Difference between both drugs: insignificant. | ||||
relapse of pain and development of acute cholecystitis within 24h | Tenoxicam: none. Hyoscine: 4 patients had pain relapse, 2 had cholecystitis. Significant difference between both drugs in both parameters. No p-vlue given for either. |