Author, date and country | Patient group | Study type (level of evidence) | Outcomes | Key results | Study Weaknesses |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fawer-C-L, Calame-A, Furrer-M-T. 1985 switzerland | 82 preterm infants less than 34 week's gestation born between april 82 to march 83 | prospective cohort study | normal ultrasound | 14% chance of abnormal neurodevelopmental outcome | Small number It is not clearly stated as to who were doing the ultrasound scans and who performed the neurological assessment and wheher they were blinded or not. Follow-up was not sufficiently long enough to pick up all the cases of neurological disability |
Isolated haemorrhages | 20% chane of abnormal neurodevelopmental outcome | ||||
periventricular haemorrhage+periventricular leucomalacia+ventricular dilatation+cerebral atrophy | 53 % chance of abnormal neurodevelopmental outcome | ||||
Stewart A L etal 1983 UCH,London | Preterm infants born less than 33 week were studied prospectively with ultrasound and neurodevelopmnetal assessment was carried out at 18 months of age | prospective cohort study | normal ultrasound scan | 8 % chance of abnormality | |
uncomplicated periventriculr haemorrhage(PVH) | 8 % chance of abnormality | ||||
ventricular enlargement +/- PVH | 38% chance of abnormality | ||||
hydrocephalus + PVH | 75% chance of abnormality | ||||
cerebral atrophy | 100% chance of abnormality | ||||
Chaudhari S, Kinare A S etal.. 1995 India | Preterm infants with gestational age less than 37 week born between jan 1991 to july 1992 had Ultrasound scans and neurodevelopmenatal outcome assessed at 1year and 2 years of age | prospective cohort | correlation between USG findings at term and neurodevelopmental outcome | sensitivity ----14.28% | Small numbers. It is unclear as to who is actually performing the ultrasound scan. Sensitivity and positive predictive value is low in the study due to small number of infants with positive findings. |
specificity ----89.2% | |||||
positive predictive value---12.5% | |||||
negative predictive value---90.6% | |||||
Khalid Aziz, David B. Vickar etal.. 1995 canada | 669 one year surviving preterm infants with birthweight 500 through 1249 g born between Jan 1,1987 and Dec 31,1990 | Prospective cohort study | Disability with abnormal scan | 36.7% | Unclear as to who were assessing disability and whether they were blinded or not. Follow up was not sufficiently long enough to account for all the cases neurodevelopmental outcome. |
Disability with normal scan | 8.9% | ||||
Those with combination of trnsient intraparenchymal periventricular echodensity,Cerebral Ventriculomegaly,and Periventricular leucomalacia | 46% disabled | ||||
Ong LC, Boo NY etal 1997 Malaysia | All Newborns with birth weight less than 1500 gms delivered between Dec 1989 and 31 Dec 1992 had cranial U/S done done during neonatal period and neurodevelopmental assessment at 12 months of age | prospective cohort study | Early scan ( Scan done on 5th day of life) | Grade 3 IVH/Periventricular echodensity)---84.6%(mostly major disability) | Unclear who did the assessment and whether they were blinded or not. Follow up was not sufficiently long enough to account for all the cases neurodevelopmental outcome. The small number of the patients in the study did not permit whether venbtrivular size or parenchymal lesion was better in predicting the outcome |
Grade1 and 2 IVH ---25%(mostly minor disabilty) | |||||
Late scan(at the time of discharge) | Uncomplicated (Normal+Resolving IVH+Transient Ventriculomegaly)---21.9%(mostly minor disability) | ||||
complicated scan(ventriculomegaly+Hydrocephalus+cerebral atrophy)---60.7%(mostly major disability) | |||||
Stewart A, Kirkbride V etal... 1996 U.C.H ,London ,U.K | cohort of preterm infants (<33 weeks) who survived between 1979 and 1991 Neurodevelopmental assessment was done at 1 ,8 and 14 years | prospective cohort study | unfavourable neonatal scan(ventricular dilatation+hydrocephalus+intraparenchymal haemorrhagic cysts+generalized atrophy) | sensitivity(64%) and specificity(87%) of disabling impairement | |
14 year study was still at an early stage as there were insufficient numbers to calculate predictive indices for neonatal ultrasound scan | |||||
Jennifer A Pinto-Martin et al.. 1999 USA | All infants weighing between 501gm to 2000gm who were cared in one of the neonatal intensive care units of new Jersey between sep 1984 to jun 1987 Motor and cognitive assessment were carried at 2 ,6 and 9 years | prospective cohort study | Infants with parenchymal lesion or ventricular enlargement | poorer motor response with all ages and there was no difference with respect to the cognitive ability | Unclear whether the person doing the motor and cognitive assessment were blinded or not. |
Infants with no abnormality or isolated GMH or IVH | good motor and cognitive respose at all ages | ||||
Roth S C, Baudin J et al 1993 UCH,London ,U.K | Preterm infants born less than 33 week who survive dfollowing treatment in the years 1979,1981,1982 neurodevelopmental assessment at 8 years of age | prospective cohort study | favourable ultrasound scan(normal+uncomplicated PVH) | Impairment--Total(26%) and Major(5%) | |
ventricular dilatation+hydrocephalus+cerebral atrophy | Impairment--Total(72%) and Major(41%) | ||||
cerebral atrophy | 20 fold increase in the probability of major impairment | ||||
Costello A M, Hamilton P A, et al... 1988 UCH,London,U.K | Survivng preterm infants born at less than 33 weeks gestation who were admitted in the years 1979 to 1981 neurological assessment at 4 years of age | prospective cohort study | Normal ultrasound scan/uncomplicated PVH | Impairment--total(22%) and major(7%) | |
ventricular dilatation | Impairment---total(50%) and Major(33%) | ||||
hydrocephalus/cerebral atrophy | Impairment---Total(69%) and Major(56%) |