Best Evidence Topics
  • Send this BET as an Email
  • Make a Comment on this BET

IL D-dimer test in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism

Three Part Question

In a [patient with suspected pulmonary embolus] does the [does a negative IL D-dimer test] adequately [rule out the diagnosis]?

Clinical Scenario

A 30 year old woman presents to the emergency department with distressing, left sided pleuritic chest pain. She may have had a pulmonary embolism and you request a D-dimer. You know the lab in your hospital utilises the IL D-dimer test and wonder whether a normal result would be sufficiently sensitive to rule out a pulmonary embolus.

Search Strategy

Medline 1966-04/03 using the OVD interface.
([ or exp Fibrin Fibrinogen Degredation Products or] AND [IL] AND [exp Thromboembolism or exp Pulmonary Embolism or pulmonary embol$.mp or or pulmonary infarct$.mp or exp venous thromboembolism])

Search Outcome

6 papers were found from the above search. 4 were relevant. One further paper was found from hand searching journals and references. These 5 papers are shown in the table below.

Relevant Paper(s)

Author, date and country Patient group Study type (level of evidence) Outcomes Key results Study Weaknesses
Legani C et al,
105 consecutive outpatients ?DVTProspective cohortROC curve to define max sensitivity of IL test230ng/ml cut off sensitivity 100% specificity 77.2%Patients ?DVT not PE High prevalence DVT Would not reflect an average emergency department population
van der Graaf F,
99 ?DVT outpatients Comparison of 13 different D-dimer testsProspective cohortIL test sensitivity90%Patients ?DVT not PE High prevalence of DVT
IL test specificity78%
Villa P et al,
86 patients with a moderate or high clinical suspicion DVTProspective cohortIltest using 255ng/ml cut off sensitivity98.4%Patients suspected of having DVT not PE Cohort had high prevalence DVT Venography not used
Iltest using 255ng/ml cut off specificity33.3%
Iltest using292ng/ml cut off sensitivity95.2%
Iltest using292ng/ml cut off41.7%
Gold EIA elisa test sensitivity90%
Gold EIA elisa test specificity57.1%
Harper P et al,
New Zealand
235 patients presenting to emergency department with ?DVTProspective cohortIL test (250 ng/ml cut off) Sensitivity94.1%All patients presented as ?DVT not PE The gold standard venogram not used in diagnosis DVT All patients underwent ultrasound (USS), but not all underwent more than one. Probable under-estimation of DVT prevalence Patients were simply advised to return to the department if symptoms did not settle
IL test (250 ng/ml cut off) SimpliRED sensitivity66%
IL test specificity51.5%
IL test SimpliRED specificity75.6%
Kovacs MJ et al,
All patients with suspected DVT (468 patients) or PE (525 patients), presenting to 4 hospitalsProspective cohortSimpli RED sensitivity80%Results combined for ?DVT and ?PE patients Cut off level of 200ng/ml was used for IL test (much lower than most labs)
IL-test sensitivity91%
Acculot sensitivity91%
Simpli RED specificity79%
IL-test specificity74%
Acculot specificity76%


To date there have been few studies measuring the accuracy of this D-dimer test. Of note, there is almost no research looking in particular at patients presenting with symptoms of PE. The sensitivity of the IL test for ruling out DVT appears to lie somewhere between 90 and 100%. It is worth noting that all of these studies used a relatively low cut off level and it is worth being aware what the cut off level is in your hospital laboratory.

Clinical Bottom Line

The IL D-dimer test alone is not sufficiently sensitive to rule out pulmonary embolus. It must be used in conjunction with another test.


  1. Legani C, Pancani C, Palareti G, et al. Performance of a new, fast D-dimer test (IL test d-dimer) for the management of outpatients with suspected deep vein thrombosis in emergency situations. Fibrinolysis and Proteolysis 1999;13(3):139-141.
  2. van der Graaf F, van den Borne H, van der Kolk M et al. Exclusion of deep venous thrombosis with D-dimer testing--comparison of 13 D-dimer methods in 99 outpatients suspected of deep venous thrombosis using venography as reference standard. Thromb Haemst 2000;83(2):191-8.
  3. Villa P, Ferrando F, Serra J, et al. Quantification of D-dimer using a new fully automated assay: its application for the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis. Haematologica 2000;85(5):520-524.
  4. Harper P, Marson C, Grimmer A, et al. The rapid whole blood agglutination d-dimer assay has poor sensitivity for use as an exclusive test in suspected deep vein thrombosis. N Z Med J 2001;114(1131):61–64.
  5. Kovacs MJ, MacKinnon KM, Anderson D, et al. A comparison of three rapid D-dimer methods for the diagnosis of venous thromboembolism. Br J of Haem 2001;115(1):140-144.