Author, date and country | Patient group | Study type (level of evidence) | Outcomes | Key results | Study Weaknesses |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Avci, et al. 2002 Turkey | 18 pregnant and lactating women Group1: 9 randomised to receive injection of 0.25 ml methylprednisolone (10 mg) with 0.5% bupivacaine Group 2: 9 randomised to thumb spica splinting F/U 12 months (9-17 months) | RCT | Success defined as complete relief of pain and negative Finkelstein test result | Group1: Success in 9/9 patients. Group 2: Failure in 9/9 patients. | Small number of participants who were pregnant and lactating women. Inadequate randomisation, no allocation concealment and blinding of treatments |
Mehdinasab and Alemohammad 2010 Iran | 73 patients 9 men and 64 women. Group 1: 37 patients had 1 mL (40 mg) methylprednisolone acetate and well-padded wrist thumb spica cast. Group 2: 36 patients were treated with a thumb spica cast for one month Follow up for six months. | RCT | Resolution of wrist pain, tenderness and negative Finkelstein test, and patient had at least 90% improvement in the pain score. | Group 1: Success in 32 patients (86.5%)Failure in 5 patients (13.5%). Group 2: Success in 13 patients (36.1%)Failure in 23 patients (63.9%) | Lack of proper randomisation, non-blinding of treatments and short duration of follow up. |
Kosuwon 1996 Thailand | 140 patients Group I 72 patients were given steroid injection followed by application of splint Group II 68 patients were given steroid injection only. | RCT | Resolution of symptoms | Success rate was 74% in patients having both treatments while it was 75% in patients having steroid injection only. | No blinding of treatments, leading to treatment allocation bias. Study conducted in a private hospital by a single person indicating bias in collecting outcome. |
Witt, et al. 1991 Massachusetts, USA | 87 wrists of 83 patients injected with a mixture of methylprednisolone and lidocaine injection. A thumb spica splint was used to immobilise the wrist for three weeks | Prospective cohort study | Satisfactory outcome defined as non-tender wrist and negative Finketstein test. | Successful in 54 wrists (62%) and were unsuccessful in 33 wrists (38%) | No randomisation of patients and no control group for comparison. |
Weiss, et al. 1994 Rhode Island, USA | 93 patients in total; 42 of these had a steroid injection treatment, 37 were treated by splint therapy and 14 patients were given both steroid injection and a splint | Prospective study | Treatment was deemed successful if no surgical treatment was undertaken and was considered a failure if surgical treatment was performed. | Significant symptomatic improvement was noted between steroid injection alone and splint alone groups (p<0.005) and between splint alone and injection/splint groups (p< 0.05). | No randomisation performed |
Lane, et al. 2001 New York, USA | Classified patients according to the severity of symptoms into three groups; namely group I (minimal pain), group II (mild pain) and group III (moderate to severe pain). They offered splint and oral NSAID treatment to 17 patients of group I who have minimal symptoms and prescribed steroid injection to 249 patients of group II and III. | Retrospective study | Patients were classified as complete resolution of symptoms, improvement or no improvement. | 15 out of 17 patients in minimal symptom group (group I) had a complete resolution of symptoms with splint and oral NSAID therapy. 249 patients in group III with moderate to severe symptoms, had betamethasone with bupivacaine injection. 76% of them were completely cured, while 7 % had some improvement and 4% did not improve at all. | No randomisation of patients. Classification of patients was purely based on subjective assessment. Retrospective study with only those patients included in the study who had a full record of the physical findings and management (selection bias) |
Peters-Veluthamaningal, et al. 2009 The Cochrane Collaboration | One randomized trial included which had 18 pregnant and lactating women | Cochrane Review | The only primary outcome measure assessed was complete relief | Number needed to treat (NNT) was 1 (95%CI 0.8 to 1.2). | Only one trial included with small number of participants |