Three Part Question
In [patients with minor injuries within a UK ED] does [a nurse practitioner or junior doctor] result in [better patient satisfaction]?
Clinical Scenario
Your Directorate Manager wishes to introduce an Emergency Nurse Practitioner service to your ED. A colleague asks if you think patients coming to the ED with minor injuries would be willing to be seen by a nurse rather than a doctor.
Search Strategy
Medline 1966-04 using the OVID interface
[{exp nurse practitioner/ OR nurse practit$.mp. OR exp nurse clinician/ OR nurse clinicia$.mp} AND {exp patient satisfaction/ OR satisf$.mp}]
Search Outcome
213 papers of which 3 were relevant
Relevant Paper(s)
Author, date and country |
Patient group |
Study type (level of evidence) |
Outcomes |
Key results |
Study Weaknesses |
Byrne et al 2000 UK | 163 patients in an A&E, a Minor accident treatment service (MATS) unit and a nurse-led minor injuries unit. Age >16 years, minor injuries | Cross sectional survey | Patient satisfaction, waiting times, length of consultations and waiting for services | 89.3% satisfaction ENP in MATS, 85.7% satisfaction in MIU. 70.7% in A&E by SHO. Significant 0.05 level. | Small numbers and compression of groups.
Use of MIU in calculations.
Long period of 8 months.
No randomisation. |
Sakr et al 1999 UK | 1453 patients age > 16 years with minor injuries | RCT | Patient satisfaction, clinical errors, documentation, accuracy of treatment, follow-up | 96.5% satisfaction ENP. 94.9% satisfaction SHO. No significant differences. | All patients seen by 1 or 2 registrars as gold standard, ? bias.
56.5 and 57.8% response rate of questionnaires. |
Cooper et al 2002 UK | 199 convenience sample, aged > 16 years with specific minor injuries. Comparing ENP to SHO. | RCT | Satisfaction, returns, quality of documentation etc | 98.8% satisfaction ENP. 87.7% satisfaction SHO p<0.001 | Non responders of self-completed questionnaire,
?bias only when ENP and researcher on duty |
Comment(s)
Difficult to assess satisfaction accurately
Clinical Bottom Line
Patients are just as satisfied, if not more so, with seeing a Nurse Practitioner rather than a junior doctor in an ED. This does not mean that they receive better care and a robust reproducible method of assessing this needs to be devised.
References
- Byrne G. Richardson M. Brunsdon J. Patel A. An evaluation of the care of patients with minor injuries in emergency settings. Accident & Emergency Nursing. 8(2):101-9, 2000 Apr.
- Sakr M. Angus J. Perrin J. Nixon C. Nicholl J. Wardrope J. Care of minor injuries by emergency nurse practitioners or junior doctors: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 354(9187):1321-6, 1999 Oct 16.
- Cooper MA. Lindsay GM. Kinn S. Swann IJ. Evaluating Emergency Nurse Practitioner services: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Advanced Nursing 40(6):721-30, 2002 Dec.