Author, date and country | Patient group | Study type (level of evidence) | Outcomes | Key results | Study Weaknesses |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Kosiak et al, 2008, Poland | 52 healthy volunteers had IVC/Aortic index measured at fasting and 8hrs after 1500-2000ml of fluid. This IVC/Aortic index was compared with IVC/Aortic index of 7 pts with Hemolytic Uraemic Syndrome, Acute Renal Failure, Nephrotic syndrome and pericarditis to estimate the treatment response. | Diagnostic, comparative, prospective, single center study. | IVC/Aortaindex as a convenient way of evaluating body fluid status. | IVC/Ao index is very useful parameter in estimating body fluid status | Single center, selection bias, small number,training issues. |
Brendan et al, 2007, Pennsylvania | 70 patients from Surgical Intensive Care Unit had cardiac US and IVC diameter measured for volume assessment (Hypovolemic and Not hypovolemic). The reference standard was expert clinical judgment of pts volume status made by the Intensivists. | Prospective cross sectional, single blinded study of convenience sample. | The bedside US is a very feasible,potentially usefull and readily availabe modality. | The concordance rate between ECJ and cardiac US was 75% (p=0.11) | Small sample, convenience sample, selection bias, single center, no documentation of inter observer reliability(kappa score). No pt follow up documented. |
The concordance rate between ECJ and IVC collapse index was 65%(p=0.72) | |||||
The concordance rate between (ECJ)expert clinical judgment and IVC diameter was 67% (p= 0.56) | |||||
The concordance rate between ECJ and CVP was 62% | |||||
Stawicki et al, 2009, Philadelphia | 124 surgical intensive care patients had IVC assessment and evaluation of left ventricular ejection fraction, mitral valve inflow, tissue doppler measurements and cardiac filling done. | Prospective, diagnostic, single center study. | To compare intensivist performed IVC evaluation (IVC-CI)with invasive CVP monitoring to determine how well they correlate. | The mean CVP values were inversely proportional to the IVC-CI (IVC collapsibility index). | Small number, single center, selection bias, no documentation of inter observer reliabilty score(kappa). |
Pts with IVC-CI <0.20 the mean CVP was 12mm Hg | |||||
In pts with IVC-CI >0.60 the mean CVP was 7.4mm Hg was | |||||
In pts with IVC-CI 0.20-0.60 the mean CVP was 9 mm HG | |||||
bedside IVC assessment(IVC-CI)can offer the treating clinician a rapid, easily repeated and non invasive adjunct in the assessment and management of critically ill patients. |