Author, date and country | Patient group | Study type (level of evidence) | Outcomes | Key results | Study Weaknesses |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Graham et al, 2006, Scotland | Consious overdose patients attending ED with a clear time of ingestion (not staggered) | Prospective Observational study of 134 patients | 63/134 History +ve | 40/63 (63%) detected, 15/63 (23.8%) treated | Small sample |
71/134 History -ve | 0/71 detected | ||||
Harington et al, 2002, England | All adult suspected overdose patients attending the ED attending between Feb and May 2000 | 307 consecutive patients | 152/307 History +ve | 8 no levels, 99/152 (65%) detected, 4/152 (2.6%) needed antidote | 6/13 GCS <15, 10/13 significant alcohol injestion other 3 frequent ovedose or multiple drugs in overdose |
155/307 History -ve | 13 no levels, 13/155 (8.4%) detected, 0/155 (0%) needed antidote | ||||
Dargan et al, 2001, England | All adult patients attending the ED over a 12 month period who had paracetamol levels measured | Retrospective audit of 411 patients (115 after collapse and 296 after OD) | 122/411 history +ve non staggered <24 hrs | 94/122 (77%) detected, 16/122 (13%) treated | Small Numbers |
136/411 history -ve | 0/136 (0%) detected | ||||
115/411 Collapse low GCS | 4/115 (3.5%) detected, 4/115 (3.5%) treated | ||||
Sporer et al, 1996, USA | All adult patients with altered mental state or overdose who had levels taken. | Retrospective chart audit of all patients with blood levels over 20 months 1992-3. 1820 patients | 177/1820 history +ve | 120/177 (68%) detected | 2 patients had taken "everything" 3 with low GCS and suspected overdose |
1643/1820 history -ve | 55/1643 (3.3%) detected, 5/1643 (0.3%) levels >20mcg/ml(>50mcg/ml), 0/1643 (0%) treated | ||||
Ashbourne et al, 1989, USA | Adults presenting with suspected or confirmed intentional overdose | 486 prospectively identified patients February to July 1986 (101 other eligible patients missed) | 114/486 history +ve | 43/114 (38%) detected | 1 treated patient didn't speak English and the paracetamol history had not been obtained initiallly. No clear reason for other 6 but treatment not required. Small study |
372/486 history -ve | 7/372 (1.9%) detected, 1/372 (0.27%) required treatment | ||||
Lucanie et al, 2002, USA | All non-paracetamol overdoses reported to a regional poison control centre over 6 months. | Retrospective study of 320/471 patients (151 missing levels) | History -ve | 23/320 (7.2%) detected >10mcg/ml, 12/320 (3.8) treated | No information on the patients treated. |
Chan et al, 1995, Hong Kong | Chinese patients presenting with overdose to the general medical wards between January 1992 and June 1993. | Retrospective study of 294 overdose patients | 86/294 History +ve | 8/86 (9.3%) treated | Small study |
208/294 History -ve | 4/208 (1.9%) detected, 0/208 (0%) treated | ||||
Skelton et al, 1998, Australia | 200 Patients selected at random from ED, with a provisional diagnosis of deliberate self-harm | Prospective cohort | Number of patients testing positive for paracetamol | 48/200 (24%) | No breakdown of results giving overall number of history +ve and –ve patients No breakdown of results for number of history –ve patients with paracetamol levels >100 mg/l |
Number of patients testing positive for paracetamol with -ve history | 7/48 (14.6%) | ||||
Overall % with >100 mg/l plasma concentration | 13/48 (27%) |