Author, date and country | Patient group | Study type (level of evidence) | Outcomes | Key results | Study Weaknesses |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Martin D, et al May 2024 UK | Forty-four studies with 222,644 participants enrolling adults and children when SpO2 was compared with a paired co-oximetry SaO2 value. | Systematic review | Overestimation of SaO2 in participants with darker skin tones | 68% (30/44) of studies | Meta-analysis was not possible because of heterogeneity in study design, population, pulse oximeter make, and data reported; the magnitude of overestimation of SaO2 in participants with darker skin tones was difficult to determine; only 11 (25%) studies actually measured skin tone. |
Magnitude of overestimation of SaO2 in participants with darker skin tones | The magnitude varied between studies, lower SaO2 was associated with a greater degree of overestimation | ||||
Shi C, et al August 2022 UK | 32 studies (6505 participants) with SpO2–SaO2 comparisons and measuring the impact of skin pigmentation or ethnicity on pulse oximetry accuracy | Systematic review and meta-analysis | Overestimated SaO2 in people with the darkest skin tones | Mean 1.11%; 95% confidence interval 0.29–1.93% | Some included studies compared SpO2-SaO2 data between different subgroups of skin pigmentation and presented only tests of significance, rather than SpO2 and SaO2 data; scales like the Fitzpatrick scale to measure levels of skin pigmentation are limited; differences between specific pulse oximeter devices, the differences between adults and their health conditions or the difference between skin pigmentation measurement methods were not considered. |
Overestimated SaO2 in Black/African American | Mean 1.52%; 95% confidence interval 0.95 to 2.09% | ||||
Aoki KC, et al September 2023 USA | 10 prospective and retrospective studies involving human patients with hypoxemia that included a measure of skin color | Scoping review | SpO2 readings vs. SaO2 values for patients of darker skin pigments | SpO2 readings in dark vs. light-skinned individuals were approximately 1% to 1.57% higher | Some studies lacked specific race and ethnicity data and most studies used self-reported race to categorize patients; small sample sizes and a lack of racial diversity were also limitations in several studies; most studies focused on adult populations and did not account for underlying diseases that might affect SpO2 readings. |
Agreement between SpO2 measurements and SaO2 with hypoxia | Error that increases if SaO2 values decrease to hypoxemic levels | ||||
Leeb G, et al April 2024 USA | Eleven fingertip pulse oximeters were evaluated in 34 healthy humans with diverse skin pigmentation utilizing a controlled desaturation study. | Prospective clinical trial | SpO2-SaO2 error between devices | Five of 11 devices had a root mean square error (ARMS) > 3%, falling outside the acceptable FDA performance range | Participants were young, healthy adults which do not reflect the heterogeneity of anatomy and pathophysiology of patients with an illness or people with comorbidities; perfusion (i.e. pulsatility amplitude), a factor known to impact POX performance, was not accounted for; relatively few pulse oximetry sensors were tested; low number of individuals recruited with dark skin. |
SpO2-SaO2 error between devices among participants in the darkest skin pigmentation category compared with those in the lightest category | Seven of the 11 POXs tested and the reference POX demonstrated a positive bias among individuals with darker pigmentation |