Author, date and country | Patient group | Study type (level of evidence) | Outcomes | Key results | Study Weaknesses |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shah Mizanur Rahman, Eimhear Quinn 2019 | Patients in acute pain secondary to traumatic pain | Case series CEBM 4 | 2 studies included with a total of 2208 participants | No evidence found to suggest superiority of methoxyflurane over Entonox and any other analgesic agents | One study was 1257 participants in labour not trauma patients. Other study does include 951 trauma patients. Both studies neglect to note the use of alternative analgesic agents or adjuncts such as ice, splinting or other analgesic medication. One study included was funded by pharmaceutical companies. No documentation of time of injury or onset of pain and time analgesia administered or with associated risks of injury complication. Both studies use self-reported pain scores introducing individual variation/subjectivity to results. |
Keith M Porter, Mohd Kashif Siddiqui, Ikksheta Sharma, Sara Dickerson, Alice Eberhardt 2017 | Patients aged >18 with trauma induced pain in the per-hospital or hospital setting | Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses CEBM 1a | 4 randomized controlled trails used for analysis, with a further two being excluded after bias assessment. Leaving 2 studies included fir quantitative synthesis | The proportion of patients experiencing pain relief at 15 minutes after start of inhalation was greater under low-dose methoxyflurane, but statistical significance was not achieved. No significant differences between the two agents. Entonox is contraindicated in any condition where gas is entrapped within the body and where expansion might be dangerous. As a result Entonox has more contra-indications in trauma compared to Penthrox. | Small size of controlled trials 2. Different pain scales use over two studies that are not interconvertible |
Murray D. Smith, Elise Rowan, Robert Spaight, Aloysius N. Siriwardena 2022 | Adults with moderate to severe traumatic pain attended by ambulance staff | Systematic review / meta - analysis of case control study CEBM 3a | Comparison of the effects of the administration of the following at reducing pain: methoxyflurane 483 patients - 753 Entonox - 802 IV morphine. 278 patients using paracetamol | Methoxyflurane reduced pain more rapidly and to a greater extent than Entonox | Bias in the reporting of pain score by the ambulance staff reporting pain. Patients were also offered additional pain relief as well as methoxyflurane making the reported effects of methoxyflurane inaccurate. |
Ana V Dias, Ziad Zeidan, Matt Copp, Frances Eslabra, Rawan Hassan, Rory Middleton 2024 | All users of Penthrox in the ED over a two month period | Case control observational study 3a | 101 participants included within the study that was completed via questionnaire. | No direct comparison made. | Small patient group. Standard pain score not recorded, No direct comparison. Low quality study |