Author, date and country | Patient group | Study type (level of evidence) | Outcomes | Key results | Study Weaknesses |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Doan Q, et al June 2019 Canada | All children visiting 8 Canadian pediatric emergency departments across 4 provinces between 2010 and 2014 | Retrospective cohort study | Association between mean ED length of stay and hospital admission within 7 days | A positive association between crowding and hospital admission within 7 days (0.8%–1.5%) | Retrospective design and use of administrative databases, which depend on the accuracy of entered data and are limited in detail. Data used was old and varied in availability across provinces. |
Gorski JK, et al. October 2021 USA | Data from the ED of a quaternary care children's hospital and trauma center during the 14-month study period to demonstrate the relationship between patients who leave without being seen (LWBS) risk and overcrowding. | Retrospective observational study | Relationship between patient LWBS risk and each crowding score | The odds ratio for LWBS risk was 1.30 (95% CI 1.27–1.33) per 10-point increase in overcrowding score | Unable to include chief complaint information as a factor in this analysis; retrospective; limited generalizability due to the single study nature. |
Relationship between patient LWBS risk and occupancy rate | Patients were 1.23 times more likely to LWBS per 10% increase in occupancy rate | ||||
Sills MR, et al. March 2011 USA | 927 patients aged 2 to 21 years treated for acute asthma at a children's hospital ED. | Retrospective observational study | Timeliness quality measures versus crowding | Patients were 52% to 74% less likely to receive timely care when crowding measure was at the 75th rather than at the 25th percentile (P<0.05). | Performed at one emergency department; retrospective; may have been confounded by inadequate adjustment for severity of illness; possible discrepancies between the electronic medical record event time and the actual event time |
Effectiveness quality measures versus crowding | Patients were 9% to 14% less likely to receive effective care when crowding measure was at the 75th rather than at the 25th percentile (P<0.05). | ||||
Timm NL, et al September 2008 USA | Pediatric ED boarding time and daily census were determined each day from July 2003 to July 2007. | Retrospective observational study | Mean length of stay (LOS) | For every 50 patients seen above the average daily volume of 250, LOS increased 14.8 minutes | Data collection from one institution; retrospective; ED boarding time was distributed over a 24-hour period and did not specifically determine impact during busy or slow times of the day; other aspects of quality of care, including safety, which were not evaluated. |
Time to triage | For every 50 patients seen above the average daily volume of 250, time to triage increased 6.6 minutes | ||||
Time to physician | For every 50 patients seen above the average daily volume of 250, time to physician increased 18.2 minutes | ||||
Patient elopement during a 24-hour period | For every 50 patients seen above the average daily volume of 250, number of patient elopements increased by three | ||||
Chan M, et al. September 2017 Canada | All patient visits to the BCCH PED from January 2008 and December 2012 for 21 years of age and younger were included for analysis. | Retrospective cohort study | Association between hospital admission versus PED crowding | Positive association between crowding and the odds of being admitted to the hospital (odds ratio 2.1) | Retrospective study design; limited generalizability; imperfect measures of PED crowding; hospitalization as an outcome measure does not discriminate between admissions related to the patient’s underlying condition and those that may result from deterioration of delayed ED care or errors associated with a crowded PED environment. |
Association between PICU admission versus PED crowding | Positive association between crowding and the odds of being admitted to the PICU (odds ratio 8.9)) | ||||
Kappy B, et al March 2024 USA | PED patients admitted to non-psychiatric services, broken into four periods: pre-COVID-19, early pandemic, COVID-19 variants, and non-COVID respiratory viruses. | Retrospective observational study | Median PED boarding time | significantly increased from Period I (acute: 2.4 h; critical: 3.0 h) to Period II (acute: 3.0 h, critical: 4.0 h) to Period III (acute: 4.4 h, critical: 6.6 h) to Period IV (acute: 6.2 h; critical: 9.5 h). | Single institution; retrospective design; analysis of return visit and readmission did not consider that children may have presented to outside EDs following their discharge from hospital. |
Boarding time survival analysis | as boarding time increased, hospital LOS increased for acute admissions and decreased for critical admissions | ||||
Boarding time versus patient safety events | PED boarding times were significantly associated with higher odds of any filed safety report | ||||
Menon NVB, et al August 2021 India | 17,463 children beyond neonatal age attending the 22-bedded emergency were prospectively enrolled from February to December, 2019. | Prospective observational study | Correlation between unfavorable ED outcomes and new admissions | Positive correlation (P<0.001) | The effect of socioeconomic status, duration of illness, and disease specific factors were not evaluated |
Correlation between unfavorable ED outcomes and bed occupancy rate | Positive correlation (P<0.001) | ||||
Correlation between unfavorable ED outcomes and number of boarders | Positive correlation (P<0.0001) |