Author, date and country | Patient group | Study type (level of evidence) | Outcomes | Key results | Study Weaknesses |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ho et al 2021 Singapore | 192 adult patients with acute shoulder or acute elbow dislocation (74 received MF, 118 received PSA) 153 acute shoulder dislocation: 68 MF, 85 PSA | Retrospective cohort study (2b) | Patients' ED LOS | Median ED LOS was significantly reduced in those that received MF compared with PSA (99.0 vs 246.5 mins, p<0.001) | Imbalance in MF vs PSA group size. Heterogeneity in procedural sedation and analgesia agents used. Patients with prior dislocation were more prevalent in the MF group (33.8% vs 18.6%). Incomplete pain score data (not included in analysis). 39 cases (6 MF, 33 PSA) were acute elbow dislocations (20.3%) which were not analysed separately to shoulder dislocations. Potential selection bias as use of MF or PSA was at the discretion of the treating physician. This also introduces the possibility of confounding by indication. It is unclear which reduction techniques were employed. This may affect the chance of success and duration of procedure. It is unclear whether other analgesic agents or adjuncts such as ice, NSAIDs or paracetamol were used. |
Duration of procedure | Median duration of procedure was significantly shorter in the MF group (16.0 vs 32.0 mins, p<0.001) | ||||
First attempt successful reduction | Successful reduction on first attempt showed no statistically significant difference between MF and PSA (86.5% vs 90.7%, P=0.365) | ||||
Umana et al 2019 Ireland | 82 patients with acute shoulder dislocation (30 received MF, 52 received propofol) | Retrospective cohort study (2b) | Patients' ED LOS | Median ED LOS was significantly reduced in those that received MF compared with propofol who had successful reductions (70.5 vs 135 mins, P<0.001) | Imbalance in MF vs PSA group size. Potential selection bias as use of MF or propofol was at the discretion of the treating physician. This also introduces the possibility of confounding by indication. No pain score data. Reduction technique was at the discretion of the treating physician and may affect the chance of successful reduction. Some patients were administered additional analgesia at triage, which may affect chance of reduction and recovery time. |
Duration of procedure | Median recovery time shorter for MF who had successful reductions (30 vs 47 mins, P<0.004) | ||||
First attempt successful reduction | Successful reduction was achieved in 80% of patients who received MF versus 98% in propofol group (p value not reported) | ||||
Young et al 2020 England | 159 adult patients with moderate to severe trauma pain and GCS of 15 79 MF, 80 standard care | Prospective cohort study (2b) | Patients’ ED LOS | Mean ED LOS significantly reduced in those that received MF compared with standard care for patients with acute shoulder dislocation (167 vs 350 min, P=0.009) | Although subgroup analysis was performed for ED LOS, the number of patients in shoulder dislocation group is not stated Incomplete pain score data (not included in analysis) Heterogeneity in PSA agents used (standard care was intravenous opioids or procedural sedation in majority of cases but other against included local anaesthetic regional block, oral opioids and paracetamol) It is unclear which reduction techniques were employed. This may affect the chance of success and duration of procedure. |