Author, date and country | Patient group | Study type (level of evidence) | Outcomes | Key results | Study Weaknesses |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Carl Marincowitz 18 November 2015 United Kingdom | Systematic review identifying studies evaluating the risk of intracranial injury in patients presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) > 24 hours after head injury | Systematic Review | Prevalence of intracranial injury in patients presenting >24 hours after head injury | Between 2.2 and 6.3% - this is generally lower than the reported prevalence in the non-delayed presentation group (approximately 7.2%) | Small number of studies/data looking at prevalence of intracranial injury in delayed presentations of head injury |
Carl Marincowitz 19th May 2016 Netherlands | CT Head requests from a 6 month period at the Hull Royal Infirmary were compared to ED records. 650 CT scans were made available for analysis | Observational study | 650 CT head scans over a 6 month period were analysed. The time of presentation after head injury was recorded. The outcomes between those presenting before and after 24 hours was then measured. A comparison was also made between groups fulfilling NICE guideline criteria and the subsequent incidence of intracranial injury | The CT abnormality rate was 8.4% for those presenting within and 9.9% for those presenting after 24 hours. The sensitivity of the NICE guidelines for intracranial injuries was 98% in those presenting within 24 hours and 70% in those presenting after 24 hours of injury. | |
Carl Marincowitz 19th May 2016 | 4073 ED consultants were surveyed of which 449 (11%) responded | Clinical vignette based survey. Conference abstract | Vignettes produced based on hypothetical cases of delayed presentation of head injury. Vignettes were based n patients with head injuries meeting NICE CT head criteria, presenting in an increasingly delayed fashion. Significant variation in clinicians application of NICE guidelines to these delayed head injury vignettes was found. Factors such as headache which do not make up part of the NICE criteria were found to increase the likelihood of clinicians requesting a CT scan. It was also found that patients who were asymptomatic at their delayed presentation would be less likely to have NICE guidelines applied, even if a NICE indication was present. | Clinicans are less likely to apply NICE guidelines when deciding to request CT scans for delayed presentations of head injury | Study based on clinical vignettes of hypothetical cases rather than measuring actual clinical decision making for 'real' patients |