Author, date and country | Patient group | Study type (level of evidence) | Outcomes | Key results | Study Weaknesses |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deftereos June 2020 Greece | 105 patients with COVID-19 confirmed with PCR-reverse transcriptase testing. 50 patients received standard medical treatment as defined by local protocols. 55 patients received standard medical treatment plus colchicine until hospital discharge or for a maximum of 21 days. | Open-label, multi-centre RCT | Time to deterioration by 2 points on the WHO R&D Blueprint Ordinal Scale | 14% (7 patients) reached the primary clinical end-point in the control group vs 1.8% (1 patient) in the colchicine group (Odds Ratio 0.11; 95%CI 0.01 - 0.96; p = 0.046)). Cumulative event-free 10-day survival was 83% in the control group vs 97% in the colchicine group (p = 0.03). | Sampling strategy not described so potential for selection bias. Study was under-recruited and subsequent small sample size is reflected in the wide confidence intervals. Unblinded study - given the primary clinical outcome depends partly on a subjective clinical decision to escalate care or not, there is potential for bias. 3 primary outcomes when there should only be one. Use of biochemical markers as primary outcome measures - this is not patient-centred. Trial sponsored by 3 pharmaceutical companies so potential conflict of interest. |
Maximum high-sensitivity cardiac troponin level | No significant difference between groups in median high sensitivity troponin level reached. | ||||
Time to reach CRP > 3 x the upper reference limit | Not reported due to 68.6% of patients having surpassed the upper reference limit x 3 at baseline. However, the maximum CRP level reached in both groups was not statistically significantly different. | ||||
Brunetti September 2020 USA | 303 consecutive hospitalized patients with COVID-19 confirmed by PCR testing, of which 41 received colchicine. After propensity score matched analysis using a-priori defined co-variates, 33 patients who received standard medical treatment were matched with 33 patients who received standard medical treatment plus colchicine. | Single-centre, propensity score matched, open-label, retrospective cohort study | In-hospital death within 28-days follow-up | 11 deaths (33.3%) in control group vs 3 deaths (9.1%) in the colchicine group (Odds Ratio 0.20; 95%CI 0.05 - 0.80; p = 0.023). | Retrospective, observational, unblinded study prone to bias. Propensity matching unable to control for unknown confounders between groups. Small sample size resulting in wide confidence intervals. Colchicine treatment regimen varied between patients in intervention arm. Significantly more hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin use in control arm. |
Scarsi June 2020 Italy | 262 patients with virologically and radiographically confirmed COVID-19. 140 patients received standard medical treatment and compared with 122 patients who recieved standard medical treatment plus colchicine. | Single centre, open-label, retrospective cohort study | Survival Rate at 21 days of follow-up | 63.6% (SE = 4.1%) in the control group vs 84.2% (SE 3.3%) in the colchicine group (p = 0.001). | Retrospective, observational, unblinded study prone to bias. Colchicine group had a significantly decreased rate of patients with underlying malignancies and a significantly increased concomitant use of corticosteroids - potential confounders of survival benefit detected. Delay in initiation of colchicine in patients in intervention arm may introduce bias - if they survived long enough for a delayed inclusion, it is possible this group contained patients more likely to survival at baseline regardless of the intervention. |
Sandhu October 2020 USA | 112 patients with COVID-19 confirmed with nasal swab PCR testing. 78 patients who received standard medical treatment were compared with 34 patients who received standard medical treatment plus colchicine. | Single centre, open label, prospective cohort study | Mortality rate | 63 patients (80.8%) in control group vs 16 patients (47.1%) in the colchicine group. | No randomised allocation of patients - risk of selection bias. Unblinded study. Small sample size. Significantly lower percentage of patients in the colchicine group with hypertension, diabetes mellitus and renal failure - may contribute to survival benefit seen. |
Intubation rate | 68 patients (87.2%) in control group vs 16 patients (47.1%) in the colchicine group. | ||||
Discharge rate | 15 patients (19.2%) in the control group vs 18 patients (52.9%) in the colchicine group. |