Author, date and country | Patient group | Study type (level of evidence) | Outcomes | Key results | Study Weaknesses |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rosenberg ES, Dufort EM, Udo T, et al May 11, 2020 USA | Admitted patients (>24 hours) with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 from 25 hospitals (n=1438) 4 Groups: Receipt of both hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin, hydroxychloroquine alone, azithromycin alone, or neither | Retrospective multicenter cohort study | Primary: in-hospital mortality | No significant differences in mortality between 4 groups. | Observational data with potential for bias. Groups significantly heterogenous with different age, sex, size and clinical conditions |
Secondary: Cardiac arrest and abnormal ECG findings (arrhythmia or QT prolongation). | Cardiac arrest was significantly more likely in patients receiving hydroxychloroquine + azithromycin but not hydroxychloroquine alone. | ||||
Alawan AA, Taher A, Alaradi AH. May 6, 2020 Bahrain | One, 33 year old patient | Case-Report | To describe clinical presentation, diagnostic and treatment process of severe case of COVID-19 in patient with ESRF. | Patient initially vitally stable, clinical deterioration requiring HDU level care. However after combination treatments responded gradually and discharged | Descriptive, single case report Observational link between medical therapy and clinical improvement Multiple therapies given simultaneously including antibiotic therapy, Lopinavir-Ritonavir, Ribavirin, Azithromycin, Hydroxychloroquine and Oseltamivir |
Million M, Lagier JC, Gautret P, et al. May 5, 2020 France | Admitted patients with positive RT-PCR treated with hydroxychloroquine with azithromycin for at least 3 days (n=1061). | Retrospective case series | Mortality | 8 participants died (0.75%) | Observational evidence only due to study design No control group, all received the same treatment. Multiple treatments assessed simultaneously |
Clinical worsening (transfer to ICU, and >10 day hospitalization) | Good clinical outcome for majority of participants (91.7%) but poor outcome for 46 participants (4.3%) which was associated with older age, severity of illness at admission and low HCQ serum concentration | ||||
Viral shedding persistence (>10 days). | Prolonged viral carriage was observed in 47 patients (4.4%) and was associated to a higher viral load at diagnosis | ||||
Nair V, Jandovitz N, Hirsch JS et al April 29, 2020 USA | Ten kidney transplant recipients with positive RT-PCR, all given azithromycin with hydroxychloroquine (n=10) | Case-Series | Describe clinical presentation, management and outcomes of immunocompromised kidney transplant patients | Generally similar clinical presentation to non-immunosuppressed patients. 3 patients (30%) died, 5 patient (50%) developed AKI, 5 patients (50%) required ICU care 7 patients (70%) were eventually discharged with median stay of 11 days (4-17 days). | Descriptive case-series with only observational evidence No control group, no comparison group Multiple treatments given and confounders present |
Abnormal ECG findings (arrhythmia or QT prolongation). | No evidence of ECG changes or QT prolongation in any patients treated | ||||
Adreani J, Bideau M, Duflot I et al. April 25, 2020 France | Isolated virus combined with varying concentrations of both hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin | In-vitro study | Viral RNA replication | Viral replication was reduced when exposed to combination of hydroxychloroquine with azithromycin | In-vitro study with no clinical component Only combination treatment assessed therefore only synergistic in-vitro effect shown |
Touret F, Gilles M, Barral K et al. April 3, 2020 (Pre-Print) France | Prestwick Chemical Library composed of 1,520 approved drugs in an infected cell-based assay | In-vitro study | Medications found to have in-vitro antiviral activity by inhibition index | Arbidol, Chloroquine and Hydroxychloroquine as well as Darunavir and Azythromycin shown to limit SARS-CoV-2 replication independently | In-vitro study with no clinical component |
Gautret P, Lagier, JC, Parola P et al. March 20, 2020 France | Patients admitted to hospital with positive RT-PCR (n=36) 2 groups: Hydroxychloroquine (n=20) treated, 6 of which received combination with azithromycin, and control (n=16) | Non-randomized control trial (“open-label” trial). | Respiratory viral load (PCR). | Combination of azithromycin with hydroxychloroquine showed 100% clearance at day 6, whereas only 57.1% with hydroxychloroquine alone although this was better than control group | Excluded patients that met inclusion criteria without indication as to reason Small sample size with no randomisation No clear indication as to why azithromycin was started within treatment group for 6 patients Significant variation in demographics of groups |
Gautret P, Lagier JC, Parola P et al. April 11, 2020 France | Patients admitted to an infectious diseases ward with positive RT-PCR, 6 participants from a previous study included as received this treatment (n=80) | Pilot observational study, Case-series | Clinical outcome | One patient died One patient admitted to ICU 65 patients discharged (81.2%) | Study asserts further investigation required as “potentially life-saving” Observational data, no comparison or control nor general population data included to compare Used data from participants from another study within the same centre |
Contagiousness as assessed by PCR and culture | PCR negative at Day 7 for 83%, and 93% at Day 8. Virus cultures from patient respiratory samples were negative in 97.5% of patients at Day 5. | ||||
Length of stay in infectious disease unit (IDU). | Mean time from initiation to discharge was 4.1 days with a mean length of stay of 4.6 days. | ||||
Saleh M, Gabriels J, Chang D et al. April 29, 2020 USA | Hospitalised patients receiving treatment for suspected COVID -19 (n=201) Chloroquine (n=10), Hydroxychloroquine (n=191) + azithromycin combination therapy (n=119) | Prospective observational Study | Instances of TdP or arrhythmogenic death | No instances of TdP or arrhythmogenic death | No outcome for clinical outcome of infection in relation to treatment No control group or documentation of other medications/treatment given |
QT prolongation secondary to treatment | All medications led to prolongation of QTc, more significant in combination group of which 7 patients had to have treatment discontinued due to prolongation | ||||
Mercuro NJ, Yen CF, Shim DJ et al. May 1, 2020 USA | Patients admitted with positive RT-PCR and radiological findings consistent with COVID-19 who were given hydroxychloroquine (n=90) + azithromycin (n=53) | Prospective cohort study | Change in QT interval after receiving hydroxychloroquine +/- azithromycin | Prolongation of QTc was significant in both groups, with greater change in concomitant group | No outcome for clinical outcome of infection in relation to treatment No control group or documentation of other medications/treatment given |
Occurrence of other potential adverse drug events. | 10 patients had hydroxychloroquine discontinued early because of potential adverse drug events, including intractable nausea, hypoglycemia, and 1 case of TdP | ||||
Sarayani A, Cicali B, Henriksen CH and Brown JD. April 19, 2020 USA | Analysis of FDA’s adverse event reporting system in relation to Hydroxychloroquine, hydroxychloroquine with azithromycin, azithromycin alone, amoxicillin with hydroxychloroquine and amoxicillin alone (>13m reports) | Comparative pharmacovigilance analysi | Events recorded included death and TdP/QT prolongation as well as accidents/injuries and depression as control events. | HCQ/CQ use was not associated with any adverse events ; Azithromycin used alone was associated with TdP/QT prolongation | Retrospective analysis of data that may have significant gaps, particularly when adverse events do not lead to clinical presentation Only assessing adverse events of medication and no applied clinically in COVID-19 context Unclear if confounding factors may change the results/other medications used |