Author, date and country | Patient group | Study type (level of evidence) | Outcomes | Key results | Study Weaknesses |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lichtenstein et al 1998 France | ICU | Prospective, observational | Screening for the comet-tail artefact arising from the pleural line can help to distinguish between cardiogenic pulmonary edema and exacerbation of COPD. | The US test was positive in 100% of patients with pulmonary edema, negative in 92% of patients with COPD, and negative in 98.75% of patients without clinical or radiologic respiratory anomalies. | Cases without definite diagnosis were excluded. In addition, non-cardiac causes of interstitial syndrome such as pneumonia, ARDS or chronic interstitial lung diseases also give rise to comet-tail artifacts. |
The comet tail artifact had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 92% in the diagnosis of pulmonary edema when compared with COPD. | |||||
Agricola E et al 2005 Italy | Post cardio-pulmonary bypass surgery | Prospective, observational | The presence and the number of comet-tail images provide reliable information on interstitial pulmonary edema. | Significant positive linear correlations were found between comet score and extravascular lung water (r = 0.42, p = 0.001), between comet score and wedge pressure (r=0.48, p = 0.01), and between comet score and radiologic lung water score (r = 0.60, p = 0.0001). | Small study size. Patients with lung diseases were excluded; therefore results may only be applicable to a narrow group of patients. |
Lichtenstein et al 2008 France | ICU patients with respiratory failure | Prospective, observational | The B profile characterizes pulmonary edema with high accuracy. | Multiple anterior diffuse B lines with lung sliding indicated pulmonary edema (n=64) with 97% sensitivity and 95% specificity. | The US operators were not blinded to the patient’s clinical presentation, thus creates potential bias to the interpretation |
Gargani et al 2008 Italy | Cardiopulmonay ward patients | Prospective, observational | In patients admitted with acute dyspnoea, the accuracy of ULC in predicting the cardiac origin of dyspnoea is high. | NT-proBNP values were correlated with the number of ULCs (r= 0.69, p<.0001). | The number of patients with non-cardiogenic dyspnoea is small compared to the number of patients with cardiogenic dyspnoea. This difference may influence the accuracy of ULCs, overestimating its specificity. |
The presence of 4 ULCs was found to maximize the overall diagnostic accuracy with a sensitivity of 81% and a specificity of 85%. | |||||
The presence of 9 ULCs had a sensitivity of 73% and a specificity of 100%. | |||||
Coppeti et al 2008 Italy | ICU patients with APE and ARDS | Prospective, observational | ULC is found in both APE and ARDS, thus cannot be used to differentiate one from the other. Other US features such as pleural line abnormalities, absence or reduction of the ‘gliding sign’, spared areas, consolidations, pleural effusion, and lung pulse are useful for differentiation. | ULC: 100% of patients with ARDS and 100% of patients with APE. | APE and ARDS groups were divided based on existing clinical criteria. US features in ARDS need validation in future prospective studies. |
Liteplo et al 2009 United States | ED patients with SOB and in whom NT-ProBNP level was sent | Prospective observational | Lung US can be used alone or can provide additional predictive power to NT-ProBNP in diagnosing CHF patients. | -A positive eight-zone US (defined as at least two positive zones on each side) had a LR+ of 3.88 and a LR− of 0.5. | US results may have been altered by treatment (e.g. diuretics) either early in their ED course or in the out-of-hospital setting, decreasing the sensitivity of the test. Lack of a true criterion standard in diagnosing CHF |
For two-zone US, LRs+ was 4.73 when inferior lateral zones were positive bilaterally and LR- was 0.3. These changed to 8.04 and 0.11 respectively, when congruent with NT-ProBNP. | |||||
Vitturi et al. 2011 Italy | Internal medical ward patients with dyspnoea | Prospective observational | Lung US is more sensitive than chest radiography and echocardiography in diagnosing HF, and it exhibits sensitivity and specificity similar to that of the NT-pro-BNP assay, but it also offers more rapid changes with the resolution of the clinical picture. | The group of patients with positive US findings had a higher frequency of HF diagnoses (X2 92.5, p < 0.005) | Patients received non-standardised treatment in emergency department before admission. Forms of treatment (e.g. diuretics) and length of stay in emergency room may affect the findings of lung US to different extent. |
Moreover, the decrease in the number of B lines at 48 h was significantly greater (p < 0.005) among patients treated for heart failure. | |||||
B lines sensitivity: 0.97; specificity: 0.79 | |||||
Prosen et al. 2011 Slovenia | Prehospital patients with acute dyspnoea | Prospective observational | ULC alone or in combination with NT-proBNP has high diagnostic accuracy in differentiating acute HF-related from COPD/asthma-related causes of acute dyspnoea | The US comet-tail sign has 100% sensitivity, 95% specificity, 100% NPV and 96% PPV for the diagnosis of HF. | Only patients with primary HF or COPD/asthma diagnosed in prehospital settings were included, and this limitation decreases the generalizability of this study to other causes of acute dyspnoea |
The combination of US sign and NT-proBNP has 100% sensitivity, 100% specificity, 100% NPV and 100% PPV. | |||||
Gallard et al. 2015 France | ED patients with acute dyspnoea | Prospective observational | B profile in lung US allows one to accurately diagnose acute LVHF in ED setting. | Lung US allowed to affirm or deny the presence of B profile with 100% reliability and diagnose acute left sided heart failure with an accuracy of 88% | Selection bias: Patient included into the study only when ED physician trained in cardiopulmonary US is available. |
Pivetta et al. 2015 Italy | ED patients presented with acute dyspnoea | Prospective, observational | The implementation of lung US with the clinical evaluation may improve accuracy of ADHF diagnosis in patients presenting to the ED. | Lung US had a significantly higher accuracy (sensitivity, 97%; specificity, 97.4%) in differentiating ADHF from non-cardiac causes of acute dyspnoea than the initial clinical workup, chest radiography alone, natriuretic peptides | Selection bias: Patient were not recruited consecutively, recruitment required presence of ED physicians with expertise in lung US. Lack of standard diagnostic criteria for the final diagnosis. ED physicians who performed the US were not blinded to the workup results. |
Liu et al. 2015 China | ED patients with acute dyspnoea | Prospective, observational | The B-line score in BLUE protocol can help make a rapid differential diagnosis between pulmonary infection and pulmonary infection with acute LVHF. | -The B-line score in patients with pulmonary infection with acute LVHF (11.5 ± 1.5) was significantly higher than those with pulmonary infection alone (7.2 ± 1.9) (P = .000). | Small sample size |