Author, date and country | Patient group | Study type (level of evidence) | Outcomes | Key results | Study Weaknesses |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Reeve J; Nichol K; Stiller K; McPherson K; Birch P; Gordon G; Denehy L 2009 New Zealand | Elective pulmonary resection via open thoracotomy 76 patients: 42 experimental group receiving 'standard care'as per a clinical pathway plus targeted physiotherapy including deep breathing exercises, mobility and a progressive shoulder and thoracic cage mobility programme 34 control group who received 'standard care' via a pathway entailing early sitting out of bed, mobilisation and a booklet containing basic respiratory advice and shoulder exercises. | Randomised controlled trial | Incidence of Post operative Pulmonary Complication’s (PPC's) | PPC’s developed in two patients from Intervention group and 1 from control. No significant difference (p = 1.00) | Unusually low incidence of PPC’s (3.9%). Would require much larger sample size than anticipated to demonstrate a powered result. The study was conducted in a single specialist cardiothoracic unit, thus may not be applied to general thoracic patients. No patient blinding was applied. Single unit study. Possible bias: Blinded assessors but the patients were aware of allocation. Staff may have become aware of allocation, despite being blinded. |
Incidence of Post operative Pulmonary Complication’s (PPC's) | Patients managed by a standardised pathway showed low incidence of PPC and was not further improved by the addition of targeted respiratory physiotherapy intervention | ||||
Hospital Length Of Stay (LOS) | No significant difference in LOS between groups, p=0.87 LOS significantly longer in those who developed a PPC (median 17 v 6 days) | ||||
Hospital Length Of Stay (LOS) | Significant difference in time to ambulate 10m (p=0.001) 41% of the intervention group achieving 10m on day 1 v's 12% of control group. | ||||
Miranda A; Dutra de Souza H; Almeida Santos B; Cipriano J; Siriani de Oliveira A; Gastaldi A 2015 Brazil | 38 patients undergoing pulmonary resection – grouped by extent of surgical procedure; biopsy/nodulectomy, lung segmentectomy or lobectomy. | Cross sectional prospective study | Pain free active range of movement (AROM) of the ipsilateral shoulder | Shoulder flexion decreased 49°(p˂0.05) and 34° shoulder abduction p˂0.05. Shoulder flexion was significantly decreased in all 3 groups on day 1 (p˂0.05). Shoulder abduction was significantly decreased in the segmentectomy/ lobectomy groups (p˂0.05). A significantly larger decrease in shoulder abduction and flexion was seen in the lobectomy group compared to other two groups (p˂0.05). | No blinding demonstrated. Short follow up (2 days post op) |
Pain free active range of movement (AROM) of the contralateral shoulder | Shoulder flexion decreased 4° and shoulder abduction 16°. Significantly decreased shoulder abduction in segmentectomy and lobectomy groups (p˂0.05). A non significant decrease in shoulder flexion in all 3 groups (p˃0.05). Range of movement was lower in lobectomy patient's compared to other 2 surgery groups. | ||||
Pain (Visual Analogue Scale) | No significant difference. Scores of 5-6/10 on Day 1 and 2 | ||||
Reeve J; Nichol K; Stiller K; McPherson K; Birch P; Gordon I; Denehy L. 2010 New Zealand | Elective pulmonary resection via open thoracotomy 76 patients 42 in experimental group receiving 'standard care' via a clinical pathway and targeted physiotherapy and a supervised progressive shoulder exercise regime and booklet and progressive home exercise programme. 34 control group receiving 'standard care' via a clinical pathway. Booklet provided with basic respiratory advise and. No physiotherapy. | Randomised controlled trial | Pain at baseline, hospital discharge, 1 and 3 months post operatively | Intervention group had significantly less shoulder pain at d/c (95% CI 0.3 to 2.2) Significantly less total pain in intervention group at 1 and 3 months | Assessors blinded but patients were not blinded. High loss to follow up, especially at 3 months. However, intention to treat analysis used. |
Active range of movement | No significant differences | ||||
Shoulder muscle strength | No significant differences. | ||||
Shoulder Pain And Disability Index (SPADI) | at 1 month was 5.7% lower (better) in interventional group. 7.6% better at 3 months in intervention group – indicates better function. | ||||
Varela G; Ballesteros E; Jimenez M; Novoa N; Aranda J 2006 Spain | 639 patients undergoing an elective lobectomy between 1994 - 2004. From November 2002, an intensive post-operative respiratory physiotherapy programme was instituted. 119 cases were recorded after this date. | Cross sectional study with historical controls. | Post operative pulmonary complications | Pneumonia: 5% in PT group v 9.2% in the control group (95% CI: 0.22 – 1.25); Atelectasis: 2% in the physiotherapy group, 7.7% in the control group (95% CI:0.05 – 0.86) | No blinding to study. Participants were not randomised. Only hospital costs were considered, nothing past discharge from hospital. |
30 day post operative mortality | Mortality lower in the physiotherapy group but non-significant (0.8% in the physiotherapy group v 3.5% in the control group; 95% CO: 0.03 – 1.79) | ||||
Length of stay (LOS) | Median LOS 5.73 days in the physiotherapy group v 8.33 days in the control group (p˂0.001). A total of 151.75 hospital days saved in the physiotherapy group | ||||
Cost of treatment/ hospital stay | Mean daily cost of a lobectomy at the time 590.00€, total of 89,523€ saved in shorter hospital stay. | ||||
Agostini P ; Naidu B; Rajesh P; Steyn R; Bishay E; Kalkat M; Singh S. 2014 United Kingdom | Planned thoracotomy and lung resection patients receiving daily respiratory physiotherapy and twice daily mobility with the physiotherapists. | Prospective, observational study as part of a single blind randomised controlled trial | Post-operative perceived pain Scored 0-3 | On day 2, 40% with lower activity reported pain of moderate/ severe v 12% with higher activity (p˂0.014). On day 3, 36% v 8% (p=0.004) | Patients were aware they were wearing a monitor, which potentially led them to undertake higher levels of exercise. |
Steps/ Time spent ‘sedentary’ or moderate/ vigorous activity | 50 patients took less than 500 steps/day 2-3, demonstrated lower steps 220 v 1128 (p˂0.001) Lower energy expenditure; lower moderate activity levels. | ||||
Length of Stay (LOS) | Significantly longer LOS 6 v 5 (p=0.003) in less active patients | ||||
Post operative pulmonary complications (PPC's) | Significantly increased PPC's in less active patients 20% v 4% (p=0.028) | ||||
Arbane G; Tropman D; Jackson D; Garrod R. 2011 United Kingdom | NSCLC patients referred for lung resection via thoracotomy or VATS. Receiving usual nursing care and routine physiotherapy or usual care plus a twice daily mobility and strengthening programme. | Single blind, randomised control trial | Length of stay (LOS) | No significant difference. Mean days 8.9 (intervention) and 11 (control) | Quadriceps strength was difficult to measure with missing points occurring frequently. Repeated measures analysis was used, showing a significant difference in group. The authors have not acknowledged how this may have impacted the results. |
Exercise tolerance: 6MWT | Significant deterioration at 5 days post op with return at 12 weeks (p˂0.001) but not significant between groups (p =0.47) | ||||
Quadriceps muscle strength | No significant difference between groups at 12 weeks but at 5 days p =0.04 for change in strength – control losing strength more | ||||
Post operative pulmonary complications | No significant differences between the groups. 2 in the intervention group; 3 in the control | ||||
Quality of life (QoL) | No significant change for any measure of QoL in either group |