Author, date and country | Patient group | Study type (level of evidence) | Outcomes | Key results | Study Weaknesses |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Krittayaphong R, Bhuripanyo K, Punlee K, Kangkagate C, Chaithiraphan S. 2002 Dec | 52 consecutive patients with symptomatic VA | a randomized placebo-controlled study | Severity of symptoms | Severity of symptoms, 24-hour ambulatory monitoring (AECG) and quality of life (QOL) were assessed at baseline and 1 month after atenolol. Atenolol significantly decreased symptom frequency (P =.03), and placebo also significantly decreased symptom frequency (P =.002) | Short observation period (1 month only), not mentioned long time benefit. Placebo improved symptoms to the same extent as atenolol, may reflect so-called placebo effect. not double blinded. The inclusion criteria requires frequent premature ventricular complex (PVC count of 100 per hour, and the conclusion may not apply to low frequency PVC. The study is on RVOT type of PVC only, while LVOT patient may not benefit from atenolol. |
24-hour ambulatory monitoring (AECG) | Atenolol significantly decreased PVC count (P =.001) and average heart rate (P <.001), whereas placebo had no effect on PVC count (P =.78) or average heart rate (P =.44). | ||||
quality of life (QOL) | Neither atenolol nor placebo had an effect on QOL. | ||||
Aronow WS, Wong R, Plasencia G, Landa D, Turbow M. 1980 Long Beach, CA 90822 | 24 patients with frequent PVCs | A double-blind, randomized study | PVCs count | Frequent PVCs were abolished or reduced by 75% or more in 10 of 12 patients (83%) given acebutolol and in 10 of 12 patients (83%) given propranolol. | No control group Not mention symptomatic relief |
Chandraratna PA. 1985 | Three centers | double-blind, randomized crossover studies | PVCs count | acebutolol significantly (p less than 0.002 to p less than 0.001) reduced mean total PVCs and complex PVCs. In all measurements, acebutolol was superior to placebo (p less than 0.02 to p less than 0.001) and comparable to propranolol and quinidine. | Not mention symptomatic relief |
Stec S, Sikorska A, Zaborska B, Kryński T, Szymot J, Kułakowski P. 2012 Poland | 84 consecutive patients | a prospective, crossover, open-label study | PVCs | Short-term treatment with propafenone was more effective than verapamil or metoprolol in suppressing idiopathic PVCs. | No long-term observation. Not double blinded |
Krittayaphong R, Bhuripanyo K, Raungratanaamporn O, Sriratanasathavorn C, Punlee K, Kangkagate C, Ch 2000 Thailand | 46 consecutive patients | Prospective study | symptom and PVCs count | Atenolol improves symptoms, decreases PVC count from ambulatory monitoring, increases exercise duration and suppresses malignant form of VA during exercise. | Only RVOT PVCs concerned.(same study group with previous one) |
Capucci A, Frabetti L, Gubelli S, Boriani G, Marchesini B, Boschi S, Ambrosioni E, Magnani B 1989 Italy | 20 patients | double-blind crossover study | PVCs count | the combination of tocainide at 1200 mg and metoprolol 200 mg is well tolerated, efficacious in a high percentage of patients, and superior to single drug therapy in patients with stable PVCs. | No parallel control group No washout phase |
Kubac G, Klinke WP, Grace M. 1988 | 30 patients | Randomized double blind trial | Responders (75% or more reduction of PVCs during 24 h Holter monitoring) | There was no significant difference in suppression of ventricular extrasystoles (sotalol 65%, propranolol 44%), with reduction in ventricular couplets being 99% for sotalol and 49% for propranolol. | No placebo control group |