Author, date and country | Patient group | Study type (level of evidence) | Outcomes | Key results | Study Weaknesses |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hespanhol 2013 Brazil | 200 Recreational runners | Prospective cohort study to determine two factors, What is the incidence of running related injuries and what factors contribute towards this. | Level of activity relevant risk factor | Minimal impact 1.01 probability | Low follow up levels Only 12 weeks of review Simple methodology. |
High impact training | 1.46 probability of stress fracture | ||||
Mohen 2012 Netherlands | 35 Dutch Male military recruits | Case-control study to assess risk factors for MTSS and prognostic factors | Risk factor for stress fracture | BMI significant risk | Poor description of methodology Small population group Assessed MTSS not stress fractures Aimed to assess risk factors but very specific measurements/only measured physical internal risk factors not external risk factors. No intervention |
Newsham-west 2009 New Zealand | 199 masters level football players ages 40-49 years | Descriptive cross-sectional study in order to profile training habits and related injuries in football players | Activity acted as a risk factor | 1-4 hours of training per week risk factor | Not related to running Didn’t define what the injuries were Didn’t have a follow up Poor methodology |
Number of lower limb stress fractures | 64 injuries/100 players 67.3% occurred during games | ||||
Hubbard 2009 USA | 146 healthy collegiate athletes | Descriptive cross-sectional study to assess risk factors for MTSS | Activity levels relevant risk factor | Control = 8.8 years/ 26.5 miles per week MTSS = 5.3 years/ 27.1 miles per week | Focused on intrinsic factors not extrinsic factors in methodology yet mentioned in results No focus on athletics activity Poor follow up |
Van middelkoop 2008 Netherlands | 1500 recreational runners 694 responded to questionnaire | Questionnaire based descriptive cross-sectional study to identify risk factors for lower extremity injuries in runners | Activity levels relevant risk factor | Running less than 40km per week was protective >60 km per week = 21.3% Number of races participated in 0-3 = 0.39 p-value/ >11 = 0.08 p-value | Large study design may limit specifics of study |
Van Gent 2009 Netherlands | Review article | To present an overview of published reports describing the incidence of various running injuries of the lower extremities | Activity levels relevant risk factor | Training frequency was a significant risk factor of overall injury RR=3.68 Increase of training of 1d/w also had OR = 1.19 Distance had an increased risk of lower limb injuries between OR= 1.6- 7.4 | No clear focus aims of study Looked at overall injuries not specific injuries and did not clarify these |
Zifchock 2006 USA | 49 Runners 25 control and 24 who had injuries | Controlled Trial with 3 aims 1. To compare kinetic symmetry in healthy runners 2. compare kinetic SI values between runners who have 1 injury 3. Compare affected to unaffected leg kinetic values | Activity levels relevant risk factor | 104 monthly miles in control group 115 monthly miles in group with Tibial Stress Fracture Speed relevant 3.7m/s in control group 3.8m/s in TSF group | Running not relevant to subject aims |
Shaffer 2006 USA | 2962 female Marine Corps recruits | Cohort Study to identify risk factors for stress fractures at boot camps. | Activity levels relevant risk factor | Low aerobic fitness and no menses in past year significantly increased risk factors Slowest time AOR = 3.54% | Didn’t explain times of aerobic fitness Not accurate measurements |
Hreljac 2000 USA | 40 runners- 16 female and 24 male divided into 2 groups | Cohort study to identify biomechanical and anthropometric variables that contribute to overuse injuries in runners | Risk factor for stress fracture | Biomechanical factors more significant than external factors | Small population size Not much follow up |
Activity levels relevant risk factor | No | ||||
Hoffman 1999 Israel | 136 male military recruits | Cohort study to examine the effects of pre-induction strength and fitness levels on the incidence of lower extremity overuse injuries | Activity levels relevant risk factor | 58.8% participated in no physical conditioning prior to training in this group 11% received stress fractures Compared with the physical active group only 7% suffered stress fractures Those who had competitive sports background suffered no fractures | Unable to access tables of data Good study design Poor follow up Relatively small sample size No clear definition of aerobic fitness |
Cline 1998 USA | 127 female soldiers: 78 control/ 49 confirmed stress fracture | Case control study to identify characteristic and factors associated with increased risk for stress fractures in military women | Activity levels relevant risk factor | Leisure activity energy expenditure (kcal/day) tended toward association with lower stress fracture risk as expenditure level increased (p=0.06) | Full text not available Self-reporting may not be accurate |