Author, date and country | Patient group | Study type (level of evidence) | Outcomes | Key results | Study Weaknesses |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
O'Neill 2014 Ireland | 46 year old female | Case report | Immobilization recommended? | 6 weeks | No control No recommendations made Unique case Rare case |
Complications present | None | ||||
Robinson 2014 New Zealand | 21 year old semi-professional footballer | Case report to demonstrate importance of non-weight bearing for first 6 weeks post stress fracture | Immobilization recomended | 6-8 weeks followed by limited WB If unsuccessful WB at 6-8 weeks then another 6 weeks NWB | Case study No control Based around only a handful of studies Follow up poor Makes generalisations about implications of research |
Complications present | Non-union fracture Long term pain | ||||
Bali 2013 India | 47 year old man | Case report to discuss the diagnosis of steroid induced stress fracture | Immobilization recommended | Prompt immobilization | Abstract only Case study |
Complications present | Not mentioned | ||||
Dobrindt 2012 Germany | 52 competitive athletes 22 male/ 30 female | Retrospective cohort study to determine the return to sports time of stress fracture based on imaging findings of severity and location | Immobilization recommended | Not mentioned | Did not mention sport of athletes No control Extrapolated conclusions Did not mention high where high risk sites were |
Complications present | Not mentioned | ||||
Royer 2012 France | Review article | To review current knowledge around stress fractures | Immobilisation recommended | Rest of 3-6 weeks for metatarsal and 6-12 weeks but does not specify NWB | Review article Does not specify NWB, just says rest which is unclear Doesn’t cover issue of complications Doesn’t justify use of US |
Complications present | Not mentioned | ||||
Hoke 2011 USA | 3 patient case studies | To present stress fracture of 3 patients following TKA | Immobilisation recomended | 40 days NWB | Over emphasises importance of surgery despite lack of evidence to confirm this |
Complications present | Non union | ||||
Duran-Stanton 2011 USA | 19 year old female military recruit | Case report of a march fracture | Immobilisation recommended | Extended NWB | Abstract only Case study |
Complications present | Not mentioned | ||||
Thelen 2010 USA | 34 year old female soldier | Case report of a 34 year old female soldier | Immobilisation recomended | Short leg cast and NWB | Case study Doesn’t expand on follow up Doesn’t have clear aims of the report Doesn’t expand on issues around non union |
Complications present | Non union | ||||
Torg 2010 USA | Systematic review of 23 reports | Meta-Analysis to compare surgical vs conservative treatment of stress fractures | Immobilisation recommended | 96% of 73 fractures treated with NWB for 6 weeks had a successful outcome 43% of 92 fractures treated with weight bearing had a successful out come | Aims not clear Doesn’t quantify what kind of casts used Doesn’t explain what a successful outcome is Not enough mention of complications that may arise |
Complications present | Not mentioned | ||||
Albisetti 2010 Italy | 150 trainee ballet dancers 80 male and 70 female aged 10-21 years | Cohort study to describe diagnosis and treatment of stress fractures in young ballet dancers. | Immobilisation recommended | 3-5 weeks of rest, casting not recommended | Poor results and not explanation of method. Stated large sample size but in reality was much smaller than this Poor extrapolation of results from data |
Complications present | Not mentioned | ||||
Hong 2009 South Korea | 12 male military recruits mean age 21.3 years | Retrospective cohort study to determine the pathomechanism of stress fractures of the proximal fibula | Immobilisation recommended | 7 days bed rest followed by FWB at 14 days. Does not mention casting. | Does not meet aims of study Doesn’t seem to have drawn any clear conclusions Results unclear Does not explain consequences of management. |
Complications present | Not mentioned | ||||
Miyamoto 2009 USA | 7 professional dancers 4 male, 3 female. | Retrospective cohort study to report on a series of 7 cases that were treated surgically following unsuccessful conservative treatment | Immobilisation recommended | 3 months NWB | Did not expand on complications, did not expand on surgery Did not explain why people had been excluded from study Put too much emphasis on surgery |
Complications present | Chronic pain | ||||
Saxena 2006 USA | 19 athletes, 11 women and 8 men | Prospective cohort study to see if the more severe a stress fracture is, the longer the healing time may be. | Immobilisation recommended | 6 weeks NWB in a below knee cast | Strange control, used two different studies may have different biases Did not seem to answer aim of question |
Complications present | Delayed union | ||||
Burne 2005 USA | 19 patients, 13 women / 6 men | Retrospective cohort study to follow up current treatment of stress fracture in a university based sports clinic | Immobilisation Recommended | 6 weeks NWB | This was more of an audit than a study Methods crude but effective No control group Small sample size |
Complications present | Not mentioned | ||||
Varner 2005 USA | 7 collegiate level athletes | Case reports to report on a reamed intramedullary nailing in a series of case reports as a treatment for stress fracture. | Immobilisation recommended | Surgical treatment, weight bearing as tolerated with crutches | Only complication found so far is in surgical treatment. No control used |
Complications present | Bursitis at sight of nail insertion | ||||
Hetsroni 2005 Israel | 3 female patients | Case reports to report on 3 cases of forth metatarsal stress fracture | Immobilisation recommended | NWB for 4 months | No control Extrapolated large data from small sample size Unique scenario |
Complications present | Prolonged healing time | ||||
Warren 2004 USA | 1 female pole-vaulter | Case report to report on a unique stress fracture in a pole-vaulter | Immobilisation recommended | NWB for 6 weeks | Case study Unique scenario Not mentioned follow up or possible complications |
Complications present | Prolonged healing time | ||||
Ito 2004 Japan | 2 elderly women | Case report to describe two cases of unique insufficiency fractures | Immobilisation recommended | NWB for 8 weeks | Case studies Question specifically avoids osteoporotic fractures. |
Complications present | None | ||||
Garcia-Porrua 2003 Spain | 6 female patients | Prospective cohort study to investigate the etiological/clinical and diagnostic approach in patients presenting with fatigue fractures. | Immobilisation recommended | NWB | Recommended NWB but did not say how long for Small population size Methods poor Did not reach criteria of inclusion |
Complications present | Osteoarthritis | ||||
Biedert 2003 Switzerland | 5 females mean age 16.8 years | Cohort study to determine whether specific symptoms or findings are present in stress fractures | Immobilisation recommended | 6 months for 3 however 2 required surgical repair | Small population Did not mention what conservative treatment entailed Did not explain why 2 athletes required surgical treatment |
Complications present | Not mentioned | ||||
Jean 2001 Taiwan | 76 year old female | Case study to describe a patient with a stress fracture of the proximal tibia | Immobilisation Recommended | 2 months immobilisation | Case study |
Complications present | Not mentioned | ||||
Saxena 2001 USA | 5 cases 4 males: 13, 50, 16 + 16 years 1 Female: 16 years | Case study series to describe the difference between 4th and 5th metatarsal stress fractures | Immobilisation Recommended | 16 weeks NWB | Case studies Wide variety of demographics in series, difficult to compare results for one demographic with another |
Complications present | Prolonged healing time | ||||
Batt 2001 UK | 1 male, 2 females: Mean age = 28 years All athletic | Cohort study to describe a series of cases of treating stress fractures | Immobilisation recommended | Rest + pneumatic leg brace for 20 weeks | Very small population size No intervention Pneumatic leg brace Long diagnosis before treatment |
Complications present | None | ||||
Saxena 2000 USA | 10 females and 9 Males all athletic | Cohort study to assess length of healing time of stress fractures based on CT findings | Immobilisation Recommended | 13 Patients treated conservatively average healing time 3-13 months | Didn’t answer question Small population Good methodology but no control or intervention |
Complications present | 5 patients received delayed healing time | ||||
Popovich 2000 USA | 6 male training companies = 1357 male military recruits | Controlled trial to see if rest during running would prevent stress fractures in military recruits | Immobilisation Recommended | None | Methodology needs improvement/ randomised Did not explain treatment of stress fractures that occurred. |
Complications present | None | ||||
Blivin 1999 USA | 20 year old male (American) football player | Case report to present an atypical presentation of a common injury | Immobilisation Recommended | Weight bearing as tolerated | Single study No repeatable data Long diagnosis time |
Complications present | Not mentioned | ||||
Van der Velde 1999 Canada | 15 year old male, 25 year old female, 30 year old marathon runner (gender unspecified) | Case series to describe three cases of tibial stress fracture. | Immobilisation recommended | Rest for two patients between 6 weeks – 3 months | One patient lost to follow up, poor for only 3 patient series. No control No mention of potential complications |
Complications present | Not mentioned | ||||
Bennell 1998 Australia | Review article | Review article to review management of stress fractures in female athletes | Immobilisation recommended | Rest for 6-8 weeks | Review article Does not mention complications in detail Over 10 years old, potential for change in evidence |
Complications present | Potential for non union | ||||
Lambros 1997 USA | 19 year old male | Case study to present the case of multiple stress fractures in a healthy adult | Immobilisation recommended | Cast immobilization for 6 weeks | Case study Little follow up Underlying pathology not explained |
Complications present | None | ||||
Swenson 1997 USA | 21 runners with a mean age of 28 | Randomised control trial to evaluate the effect of pneumatic leg brace on return to play time | Immobilisation recommended | Pneumatic leg brace increases return to activity by 35 days and reduces disabling pain by 30 days | Didn’t describe what traditional treatment was compared to experimental procedure. |
Complications present | Not mentioned | ||||
Ballas 1997 USA | Review article | Review article to describe common overuse injuries in runners. | Immobilisation recommended | Rest (time not specified) | Review article Abstract only Over 10 years old, conclusions may be out of date. |
Complications present | Not mentioned | ||||
Chang 1996 USA | 5 male military recruits: mean age 25 | Cohort study to review 5 cases of stress fracture treated surgically | Immobilisation recommended | Rest for 6 months prior to surgery | Small population size Follow up poor Did not describe sex of recruits Did not explain what criteria allowed entry into study |
Complications present | Prolonged healing time | ||||
Bradshaw 1996 Australia | 4 male athletic individuals aged 30, 37, 35 +30 | Case study series to describe a series of 4 stress fractures | Immobilisation recommended | 2 treated with 3 weeks of NWB rest | No follow up Small population size Difficult to extrapolate results further Brief case histories in all. |
Complications present | Delayed healing Prolonged pain | ||||
Khan 1992 Australia | 82 athletes 31:51 Female: Male ratio | Retrospective cohort study to evaluate if surgery or conservative management is the treatment of choice for stress fractures | Immobilisation recommended | 6-8 weeks of NWB treatment | Poor selection criteria No follow up Did not explain method of immobilization |
Complications present | Continued pain Delayed healing |