Author, date and country | Patient group | Study type (level of evidence) | Outcomes | Key results | Study Weaknesses |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nicola S. Anstice, BOptom, PhD, John R. Phillips, MCOptom, PhD 26 January 2011 New Zealand | 40 Children. Inclusion criteria: -(11–14) years old -SER between -1.25 and -4.50 D -Myopia progression ≥ 0.50D in the previous 12 months -Best corrected spectacle visual acuity of Snellen 6/6 or better -Prepared to wear contact lenses for at least 8 hours/day. Exclusion criteria: -Astigmatism of ≥1.25 D -Anisometropia ≥1.00 D -Strabismus at distance or near -Ocular or systemic pathology likely to affect refractive development or successful contact lens wear or a birth weight of 1250 g. | Prospective, randomized, paired-eye control, investigator-masked trial with cross-over. (Level II) | Myopia progression and eye elongation were reduced significantly in eyes wearing Dual-Focus soft contact lenses. | In 70% of the children, myopia progression was reduced by 30% or more in the eye wearing the Dual-Focus (DF) lens relative to that wearing the Single Vision Distance (SVD) lens. | -Methodological flaws(e.g. the study was not carried out under the binocular condition in which the lenses would normally be worn). -Study short duration. |
Period 1 (Baseline to 10 Months): | -Change in refraction (D): P<0.0001, Percent Reduction:37%. -Eye elongation (mm): P<0.0001, Percent Reduction:49%. | ||||
Period 2 (Cross-over to 20 Months): | -Change in refraction (D): P=0.003, Percent Reduction:54%. - Eye elongation (mm): P<0.0001, Percent Reduction: 80%. | ||||
Carly Siu Yin Lam, Wing Chun Tang, Dennis Yan-Yin Tse, Ying Yung Tang, Chi Ho To 29 October 2013 China | 221 children. Inclusion & Exclusion criteria: -(8–13) years old -SER (−1.00 to −5.00D) -Astigmatism (1.00 D or less) -Anisometropia (1.25 D or less) -Spectacle corrected monocular VA 0.0 logMAR or better -Contact lens corrected monocular VA: 0.1 logMAR or better -Free of ocular and systemic abnormalities might affect visual functions or refractive development -No prior use of PALs, bifocal contact lenses -No contraindication for contact lens wear -Willingness to wear contact lenses regularly | Prospective, randomized, controlled, and double-blinded study. (Level II) | The daily wearing of DISC lens significantly slowed myopia progression and axial elongation in Hong Kong schoolchildren. | Myopia progressed 25% more slowly for children in the DISC group compared with those in the control group (0.30 D/year; 95% CI −0.71 to −0.47 vs 0.4 D/year; 95% CI −0.93 to −0.65, p=0.031). | -Methodological flaws (e.g.when retinal curvature profile was not measured) -High dropout rate caused by different reasons. -sample were from specific geographical location (Chinese children). |
Myopia in children who wore the DISC lenses for ≥ 5 hours/day progressed 46% (mean difference=−0.382 D, p=0.001; 95% CI −0.59 to −0.17) less than those in the SV group. | |||||
Laura E. Downie, B.Optom., Ph.D., F.A.C.O., P.G.Cert.Oc.Ther., Dip.Mus.(Prac), A.Mus.A. and Russell 4 July 2013 Australia | 56 Children. Inclusion criteria: -Younger than 16 years -Myopia more than 0.50D in each eye -Astigmatism less than 2.00D in each eye -Anisometropia less than 1.50D -Best VA (at least 6/7.5). Exclusion criteria: -Ocular or systemic conditions that may affect refractive error developmen | Retrospective, controlled study. (Level III-3) | Orthokeratology (OK) lenses can reduce the rate of progression of childhood myopia over the long term. | OK eyes showed a significantly (P‹0.05) more stable myopic refractive prescription than control eyes over all of the 2-year treatment intervals. | -Lack of masking. -Methodological flaws(e.g. different measurement techniques and practice protocols, since patients were derived from different optometric practices). |
Padmaja Sankaridurg, Brien Holden, Earl Smith III,Thomas Naduvilath, Xiang Chen 20 October 2011 China | 60 children. Inclusion & Exclusion criteria: -age: 7-14 years -myopia: -0.75 to -3.50D -astigmatism: -1.00 D or less -same geographic and demographic locale -examined by the same researchers using the same facilities, equipment, and methods -best corrected VA (at least 6/9.5) in both eyes -No Ocular/systemic pathologies -subjects were willing to wear the lens type assigned to them. | Derived from randomized, controlled, prospective clinical studies. (Level III-3) | Contact lenses that is designed to reduce relative peripheral hyperopia can slow the rate of progression of myopia in children. | At 12 months, 59.4% of the spectacle lens–wearing eyes had progressed by at least −0.75 D in comparison to only 28.6% of the eyes in the contact lens group. (odds ratio, 3.8; 95% CI, 1.5–9.5; P = 0.005). | -Lack of proper randomization. -Methodological flaws (e.g. some clinical criteria were not investigated before applying intervention). |
Takashi Fujikado, Sayuri Ninomiya, Takuma Kobayashi, Asaki Suzaki, Mitsuhiko Nakada, Kohji Nishida 23 September 2014 Japan | 24 Children. Inclusion criteria: -age 6–16 years -children and parents agreed to wear randomly assigned CLs -spherical refractive error (-0.75 D to -3.50 D) -astigmatism < 1.0 D -vision correctable to at least 20/20 in both eyes -normal ocular findings. Exclusion criteria: -anisometropia ≥ 1.0 D -presence of strabismus -ocular diseases and history of orthokeratologic lens, bifocal, or progressiveaddition spectacle wear in the past 12 months. | Pilot, randomized, controlled and blinded study. (Level II) | Low-addition soft CLs with decentered optical design can reduce the degree of axial elongation in myopic children. | Change of axial length between 12 months and 1 month in the new-CL group (0.09±0.08 mm) was significantly smaller (47%) than that in the control-CL group (0.17±0.08 mm, P<0.05). | -Small sample size. -Methodology flaw(e.g. short follow-up period). |