Author, date and country | Patient group | Study type (level of evidence) | Outcomes | Key results | Study Weaknesses |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pepe et al 2015 USA | N/a | Literature review | Unique training challenges described | Quality, orientation and type of experience initial training key determinant of success | Critical review of prehospital intubation as a wider topic with training a small element. |
Difference between pre-hospital and in-hospital environment described | |||||
Value of street wise, highly experienced trainers and supervisors | |||||
Sergeev et al 2012 Israel | 98 physicians and 85 paramedics from the Israeli military | Anonymous structured questionnaire | Paramedic training described | Paramedics have higher exposure to intubation during training (51 vs 32 supervised and 14 vs 2.8 unsupervised) | Study includes physicians as well as paramedics. Data based on self-reporting via questionnaire. Intubation one skill amongst many studied. |
Training modality and self-confidence related | Unsupervised > supervised > mannequin training | ||||
Plateau in self-confidence described for training modalities | 30 mannequin intubations necessary to reach plateau | ||||
Warner et al 2010 USA | 56 paramedic students over 3 years | Secondary analysis of prospectively collected data | Paramedic intubation training described | Mannequin training with instructors and lectures followed by in-hospital practical experience. Once 5 succesful intubations performed in-hospital student then allowed to intubate under supervision in the field. | RSI drugs used in majority of pre-hospital intubations. Use of self-reporting for data collection. |
Location and number of intubations described | Median 29 intubations over 3 years. around 1/3rd in pre-hospital setting. | ||||
Learning curve for intubation described. | Plateau described above 15 intubations for overall success but no plateau up to 20 intubations for pre-hospital first pass success. | ||||
Deakin et al 2010 UK | N/a | Expert opinion | Comment on IHCD standards which required 25 intubations (including 5 unassisted) during hospital based training. | Lack of evidence for 25 intubations. | Expert opinion |
Comment on intubation as a skill practiced by all paramedics. | Suggestion that intubation should be a skill only used by a subset of paramedics. | ||||
Comment on availability and method of intubation training. | Description of declining training opportunities but suggestion that basic skills and knowledgecan be gained and practiced on a mannequin | ||||
Deakin et al 2009 UK | 15 UK Ambulance trusts | Survey of initial and ongoing intubation training | Initial training required for intubation by each trust. | 5-25 intubations in theatre. Some trusts accepting lesser numbers if paramedic judged competent. | Survey based on old method of paramedic training which has larely been replaced now. |
McCall et al 2008 Australia | 58 paramedics with advanced airway management skills | Prospective observational study of intubating laryngeal mask | Training required to perform intubation. | Succesful completion of respiratory theory paper plus 20 supervised intubations in hospital. | Brief mention of intubation training as not main focus of paper. |
Thomas et al 2007 USA | 14 paramedics and 6 EMS director physicians | Focus groups and interviews | Adequacy of paramedic intubation training. | "Bare minimum" standards and lack of uniformity in education and mentoring. Lack of practice opportunities in theatres. | Study of wider subject of challenge in out-of-hospital intubation. Select sample of paramedics and physicians. |
Wang and Katz 2007 USA | N/a | Application of 'Skills-Rules-Knowledge' conceptual framework to intubation | Recommendations around intubation training. | Recommend training intubation as part of wider airway management approach. | Application of theoretical framework. |
Support use of simulation as a supplement to live experience. | |||||
Johnston et al 2006 USA | 161 directors of paramedic training programs | Anonymous structured questionnaire | Description of operating room training. | Median 17-32 hours access operating room per student. | Focus of study limited to paramedic student access to operating rooms and only included accredited training programs. |
Median 6-10 intubation attempts per student. | |||||
Increasing competition for access to operating rooms. | |||||
Wang and Yealy 2006 USA | N/a | Review of recent literature on paramedic intubation | Paramedic training requirements compared to other intubating professions. | Disparity between paramedics (5) and other intuabting professions requirements (35-200) in terms of number of intubations required. | None |
Paramedic student intubation attempts described. | Median of 7 intubation attempts whereas 15-20 necessary for baseline proficiency. | ||||
Different training strategies described. | Brief description of varying training strategies including mannequin, animal, operating room, simulator and cadaveric. | ||||
Hall et al 2005 Canada | 36 paramedic students with no prior intubation experience | Prospective randomised controlled trial | Comparison of 10 hours simulation versus 15 operating room intubations. | Simulator training was found to be equivalent to operating room training in terms of success and complication rate. | Students all had 20 hours didactic and video training plus 10 hours mannequin training prior to study. Testing carried out in operating room. |
Wang et al 2005 USA | 60 paramedic training programs with 802 paramedic students | Secondary analysis of longitudinal, multi-centre data | Reports of intubation success on live patients used to model learning curve | 9.5 mean and 7 median intubations per student. | Self-reported data used but mannequin and simulator experience excluded. Majority of intubations were in opearting rooms. Number of intubations described but no accounting for quality or difficulty of intubation. |
Operating room described as ideal training. | |||||
Pre-hospital and ICU intubation provides greatest learning benefits but starts with lower success rate, | |||||
Suggestion that paramedic students require >15-25 live intubations to acheive >90% success. | |||||
Pratt and Hirshberg 2005 USA | 4 EMT-Basics who successfully completed an intubation training program | Observational study | Training undertaken by participants described | 14 hours of didactic learning, 20 hours of practical sessions and 10 successful live intubations. | Small number of participants selected based on experience, interest and ability to complete the project. |
Ongoing training by participants described. | Refresher training every 90 days. | ||||
Success rate of participant intubation in respiratory and cardiac arrest. | 94% success rate in 32 attempts. | ||||
Mulcaster et al 2003 Canada | 20 non-anaesthesia trainees including 12 student paramedics | Longitudinal study of intubation under training conditions in the operating room | Initial training described | >20 successful mannequin intubations after training by a staff anaesthetist | Only uncomplicated airways used with drug assistance in the operating room setting. Study sample includes mixed population. |
Statistical modelling of necessary intubations to perform a | 47 intubations necessary to have a 90% probability of a good intubation | ||||
Owen and Plummer 2002 Australia | 115 healthcare professionals including <20 paramedics | Description of intubation teaching program | Teaching methods described | Logical progression using video, demonstration and practice on different airway models with feedback | Unknown number of paramedics described as having "extensive skills in airway management". Findings limited to simulation as no live patients intubated. |
Varying group sizes tested | 2 students per group described as most effective | ||||
Optimal session length described | 75-90 minute sessions optimal | ||||
Paramedic learning curve described | Rapid learning curve approaching 100% success after 6 attempts | ||||
Levitan et al 2001 USA | 36 paramedic trainees using an instructional video in addition to normal teaching | Cohort comparison against historical data | Paramedic training described | 42 hours didactic teaching including mannequin practice. Intervention group watched a 26 minute instructional video 3 times. | Historical cohort used as comparison. Lower mean attempts by video group (2.8 vs 7.0). Intubations reported all based in operating room. |
Success rate with additional video instruction compared to normal instruction | Video group 88.1% mean succes rate vs normal group 46.7% mean success rate | ||||
Plummer and Owen 2001 Australia | 13 paramedic trainees in a cohort of 100 subjects | Development of a statistical model describing the process of learning intubation | Description of best fitting model | Logarithmic model has best fit with observed data. Rapid early gains leading to a plateau after around 10 attempts | Purely based on mannequin / model intubation. Low frequency of >15 intubations. Unknown previous intubation experience of paramedics. Paramedics only 13% of population. |
Comment on use of multiple different airway trainers | Changing trainers decreases success rate but promotes retention and transferability of skill | ||||
Comment on value of successful versus unsuccessful practice | Trainees learn more from successful than unsuccessful intubations | ||||
Stratton et al 1991 USA | 125 paramedic students randomised to mannequin only or mannequin plus cadaver training in intubation | Prospective evaluation comparing intubation success rates after randomised training | Clear description of training program | 60 minute didactic lecture, 5x20 minute supervised practice sessions on mannequin with distractors. Open access to mannequins for self-guided practice. Cadaver group completed 3 physician supervised cadaver intubations | Small number of actual intubations. Participants were mostly firefighter paramedics so different model to UK practice. Self reported data with additional monitoring. |
Success rates of both groups described | Mannequin only 82% vs mannequin plus cadaver 83% mean individual success rate | ||||
Complication rates of both groups described | Similar numbers of complications reported in both groups | ||||
Stewart et al 1984 USA | 130 advanced life support technicians | Prospective study comparing training methods used introducing intubation as a new skill | Varying combinations of training described | Groups 1 and 2 had lectures, demonstrations, mannequin use, animal intubation and operating room experience. Group 3 had no operating room experience. Group 4 had only classroom instruction and mannequin practice. No significant difference in success rates based on training method were found. | Study conducted 30+ years ago. Study limited to narrow selection of patients including cardiac arrest and deep coma |
Success rates described over time | Overall 90% success rate. Groups 3 and 4 had lower initial success rates but then all groups acheived 94.5% success which was attributed to experience. | ||||
Toda, Toda and Arakawa 2013 Japan | 32 paramedics being trained in intubation | Observational study of the introduction of intubation as a new skill for Japanese paramedics | Clear description of training undertaken | Standardised lecture, video learning, mannequin practice and 30 live intubations. | All intubations performed in the operating room on healthy patients with anaesthetic drugs. Maximum of 30 intubations by any participant. |
Intubation learning curve modeled | 30 live intubations leads to 87% success rate. Little benefit from less than 13 intubations shown. | ||||
Prevalance of complications studied | High rate of complications amongst novice intubators which decreases with experience |