Author, date and country | Patient group | Study type (level of evidence) | Outcomes | Key results | Study Weaknesses |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Remy, C et al. 2005 France | 7 PRCTs, 265 patients with PCA morphine plus paracetamol vs. 226 patients with PCA morphine alone | Meta-analysis | Morphine use | 24 hour mean reduction of 9 mg (95% CI, -15 to -3 mg; P=0.003) Paracetamol reduced morphine consumption by 20%. | Meta-analysis of post-operative patients on PCA morphine. Thus different scenario to the emergency department. This meta-analysis may lack power because it included too few patients, however all 7 trials had a methodology of high quality. 1 trial used oral paracetamol 6g daily. The side-effects reported may have been attributed to other post-operative causes rather than morphine |
Morphine side-effects | Paracetamol did not decrease the incidence of morphine side-effects | ||||
Patient analgesia & satisfaction | Satisfaction scores were comparable in both groups. Only two studies showed a significant decrease in VAS scores 24 h after surgery, and four studies show no significant differences. | ||||
Elia, N et al. 2005 Switzerland | 10 PRCTs. 379 PCA morphine plus IV paracetamol vs 334 with PCA morphine alone | Meta-analysis | Morphine Use | 24 hour weighted mean difference of -8.31mg [95% CI of -10.9 to -5.72] | Meta-analysis of post-operative patients on PCA morphine. In controls, 24-h morphine consumption was considerable. Thus different scenario to the emergency department. The study also analysed nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors with a total of 52 randomised placebo-controlled trials, 10 of which considered paracetamol alone. 2 trials used rectal route. 1 trial used oral route with 6g daily dose and reported largest decrease in pain intensity (still not significant). In control groups, the average VAS was less than 3 cm; therefore, it may be difficult to demonstrate an additional benefit with an analgesic when baseline pain is low and pain intensity at rest only could be analyzed |
Morphine Side-effects | Paracetamol did not significantly decrease the incidence of respiratory depression, nausea and vomiting, urinary retention, or sedation | ||||
Patient analgesia | 5 trials (175 active vs 180 control) reported no significant reduction in VAS (visual analogue score). Mean difference -0.29 [-0.71 to 0.14] | ||||
Aubrun, F et al. 2003 France | 550 post-op patients receiving 4 hourly morphine s.c., 275 with propacetamol vs 275 with placebo | PRCT | Morphine Use | Morphine requirements over 24 hours were only decreased by 6.5mg in the propacetamol group (21 vs 14.5 mg, P<0.001) Patients in moderate pain (n=395), morphine requirements decreased by 37% (P<0.001) and the percentage of patients requiring no morphine was greater (21 vs 8%, P=0.002) in the propacetamol group. Patients in severe pain (n=155), morphine requirements decreased by 18% (P=0.04) in the propacetamol group and the number of patients who did not require morphine (3 vs 8%) did not differ significantly | Post-operative study. Blinding – possibly single. >20% of patients had received NSAIDs in addition to paracetamol. Subcutaneous morphine doses (fixed 5-10mg 4 hourly prn) administered were low – median subcutaneous dose of morphine was 10 mg in the control group. |
Morphine Side-effects | Morphine-related adverse effects did not differ between groups (42 vs 46%, not significant). | ||||
Van Aken, H et al. 2004 Belgium | 95 patients after surgical removal of 3rd molar teeth under GA. 31 received IV propacetamol, 30 received 10 mg IM morphine. 34 placebo | PRCT | Need for rescue morphine medication | 21of 34 in placebo 6 of 31 in propacetamol group (p<0.0009) 4 of 30 in morphine group (p<0.027) | Post-operative study. IM morphine used which is much less strong analgesic than its equivalent given through intravenous route. Dental surgery post-op patients in mild to moderate pain evaluated. Study may not have had adequate power to identify real differences between propacetamol and morphine in this model due to low number of patient in study. No Confidence Interval analysis. External validity of study thus uncertain. |
Adverse events | Adverse events were significantly less frequent in the propacetamol group than in the morphine group (P <0.027). No CI stated | ||||
Patient analgesia | No statistically or clinically significant differences were found between propacetamol and morphine for any sum or peak measures of analgesia | ||||
Cakan, T et al. 2008 Turkey | 40 post-op patients. 20 received paracetamol iv vs 20 placebo | PRCT | Morphine Use | Morphine consumption was not statistically significantly different between the groups (P>0.05). | Post-operative study. Only 40 patients in study. No Confidence Interval analysis. External validity of study thus uncertain. |
Side-effects | Vomiting in placebo group was significantly higher (14 vs 7) (P=0.027). | ||||
Analgesia | Significantly more patients in the paracetamol group rated their pain management as excellent (45% vs. 5%). Pain scores at rest and on movement at the 12th, 18th, and 24th hours were significantly lower in paracetamol group (P<0.001) |