Author, date and country | Patient group | Study type (level of evidence) | Outcomes | Key results | Study Weaknesses |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ruddy J, Proops DW, Pearman K et al 1990 UK | 48 patients age 3-14 years. | Randomised into two groups; Group 1 Naseptin cream twice daily both nostrils for 4 weeks. Group 2 Cautery with 75% silver nitrate stick to prominent vessels. | Complete Resolution | Naseptin Group 1 12 patients, Cautery Group 2 13 | 3 children lost to follow up. Unable to blind either clinician or patient. Small sample size. Study not powered. |
Partial Resolution | Naseptin Group 1 4 patients, Cautery Group 2 3 patients | ||||
Failure | Naseptin Group 1 7 patients, Cautery Group 2 6 patients | ||||
Chi-squared test | No statistically significant difference | ||||
Kubba H, Mac Andie C, Botma M et al May 2001 UK | GP referrals to Otolaryngology department for recurrent epistaxis in children aged 1 -16 years. 103 patients included. 52 to control, 51 to treatment. | Children randomly allocated to treatment group consisting of Naseptin cream to both nostrils twice daily for 4 weeks of no treatment group. Powered study analysed on intention to treat analysis. Doctor masked to patient group until after examination and data recorded. | Complete resolution in 4 weeks | Treatment group 26/47 (55%) had no bleeds, control group 12/41 (29%) p<0.05 47% relative risk reduction 95% confidence interval 9-69% | Comparison group received no treatment as no placebo could be identified that would provide no effect. Loss to follow up rate, although telephone contact attempted if patient failed to attend clinic.5 children in the treatment group id not receive the treatment as planned. |
Number needed to treat | 3.8 (95% confidence interval 2.5-8.5) | ||||
Kara N, Spinou C, Gardiner Q Jan 2008 Uk | Survey to ENT clinicians regarding topical management of anterior epistaxis. | A questionnaire was posted out to all 105 ENT-UK registered trainees or Consultants within Scotland with a 95% response rate. | Most commonly used topical treatment | Naseptin used most commonly by 83% of Consultants and 92% of trainees. | Survey based on clinicians registered with ENT-UK. Possible some ENT clinicians missed from list. |
No topical treatment used | No topical agent in 4%. | ||||
Frequency of Naseptin application | twice a day 46%, three times per day 35% | ||||
Consultants advocated method of Naseptin application | Inserting nozzle of tube into nostril 57%, direct application with patients finger 32% | ||||
Duration of treatment | Two weeks 45%, one week 17%, one month 17% | ||||
Murthy P, Nillsen EL, Rao S et al 1999 UK | Between 1994-1996 64 patients with recurrent epistaxis presenting to ENT outpatient clinic. Included children and adults, mean age 34 years. | Patients randomized to two groups. 22 patients in Group A Naseptin cream twice daily for two weeks, 28 patients in Group B cautery then Naseptin cream twice daily for two weeks. 50/64 (75%) of patients complied with Naseptin application and completing post treatment questionnaire. | Complete resolution | 14 patients in Naseptin alone group versus 16 patients in cautery and Naseptin group. p=0.76, no statistical significance between two groups. | Study not powered. Randomisation process not detailed. Small sample size. |