Author, date and country | Patient group | Study type (level of evidence) | Outcomes | Key results | Study Weaknesses |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
S Ahmad, M W Beckett 2004 United Kingdom | 3 cohort studies met the criteria: Laxer 1985 Trimble 1978 Anzola 1993 (total 102 patients) | meta analysis | Serum prolactin level (Prolactin test: 3 x baseline) in patients who suffered from seizure vs pseudo seizure for the diagnosis of seizure | Serum prolactin appears to be released at the onset of a generalised tonico-clonic seizure reaching a peak at 15-25 min ad 1h. Pooled sensitivity: 0.62 (IC 95% o.40-0.83) LR+ : 8.92 (IC 95% 1.31-60.91) Pooled specificity: 0.89 (IC 95% 0.60-0.98) LR- : 0.44 (IC 95% 0.22-0.91) | 2/3 studies did an EEG as a diagnosis test gold standard. Small sample of patients (51, 14, 37). Very short description of studies included. |
Suleyman Aydin et al. 2011 | 50 epileptic male of 20 years old 20 patients with psychogenic event 20 controls matched patients Intervention : Medications (carbamazepine or valproic acid) were stopped for 48 hours. Blood sample was drawn at 5 minutes, 1, 24 and 48 hours after the seizure and once in control subject | Prospective cohort study | Serum PRL level (and ghrelin and nesftatin-1) in patients who had a seizure vs healthy control patients. | In patients diagnosed with secondary generalized seizure and primary generalized seizure serum PRL concentrations were highest within 5 minutes and decreased rapidly after 1 hour compared to control9 (IC 95% 8-10) vs 1.8 (IC 95% 1.7-1.9). | Study population different from the emergency department population. No comparison with other causes of syncope. Sensibility/specificity/LR of PRL blood level are not reported Serum PRL level were drawn only once from control subject. |
David K. Chen et al. 2005 | 1. One class I study and nine class II studies 2. Two class II studies (57 patients) Intervention : 1. Serum PRL measured 10-20 min post seizure. EEG was used as the gold standard. 2. Serum PRL during Head-up-tilt-test on patient at risk of syncope or non at risk | Systematic review | 1. Serum PRL level to differentiate generalized seizures from psychogenic lost of consciousness | 1. Pooled sensitivity ranged from 46.1 to 60%Pooled specificity ranged from 95.9-96.3%. PPV >99% but low NPV. PRL is useful whenmeasured at 10 minutes to differentiate generalized seizures from psychogenic lost of consciousness . | Small sample study Only 1 study class I evaluated Criterion for elevated PRL are variable |
2. Serum PRL level to differentiate generalized seizures from syncopes | 2. 25 syncopals subjects showed a significant elevation of twice the baseline of PRL level compared to nonsyncopal patients. Prolactin is not useful to differentiate a seizure from a syncope. | ||||
Vipin Mishra et al. 1990 | 3 groups : - 35 patients with true seizures (15 generalized tonico-clonic seizures (GTC), 11 complex partial seizure (CPS) and 9 simple partial) - 20 cases of pseudoseizures - 22 matched healthy persons Intervention: Serum PRL at 15-20 minutes post seizure and at 6-8 hours post. Serum PRL were drawn once from healthy subject. | Prospective cohort study | Serum PRL level to differentiate GTC seizures from pseudoseizures. | 15-20 minutes post seizure, there is a significant rise of PRL in GTC seizures and in CPS compared to pseudoseizures, healthy subject and simple partial seizure (p<0.001). At 6-8 hours post, there is no significant rise between groups. | Small sample study; Very brief details about how the study were conducted; |