Author, date and country | Patient group | Study type (level of evidence) | Outcomes | Key results | Study Weaknesses |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bialocerkowski et al 2005 Australia | Infants and Children | Systematic review NICE Level of evidence 2++ (into effectiveness of conservative management with children with Erb’s Palsy) | All studies lacked clear description of what constituted conservative management. Splinting was one of components considered to be part of conservative management alongside passive exercise, ‘gentle regular exercises’, ‘active and passive movement’, dynamic traction and home exercise programme. Only Eng et al (see below) mentioned splinting out of the eight studies that were reviewed. There was no synthesised evidence of splinting’s effectiveness as part of conservative management. A definition of what conservative management constitutes has not been made. There has been no comparison of effectiveness of conservative management with a control group. | Conservative management was variable. Only 1 of 8 articles (Eng et al, see below) mentioned splinting. This was ranked low on the hierarchy of evidence and no randomised controlled trials were found. | All studies lacked clear description of what constituted conservative management which limits replication in the clinical setting. The only reliable outcome measure for this patient group noted in the article is the Active Movement Scale, which was not used in Eng et al or any other study. Measures that were used did not have evidence of validity and reliability. Only less severely affected infants received conservative management (others received surgery) which made it difficult to conclude the effectiveness of this management within a general population. Study’s descriptions of the treatment were often brief and lacked information. Most studies were undertaken by physicians or surgeons, with little involvement from therapists (who would have had a significant role in the conservative management of these patients). |
Eng et al 1996 USA | 186 infants/ children (over 50% seen in 0-1month) (85% within 0-3months) All patients first seen under 15months of age | Retrospective study NICE Level of evidence 3 | This paper reviewed the outcomes with patients who have been conservatively managed. Conservative management comprised of a study of shoulder stabilisation, gentle passive range of movement exercises, massage and sensory feedback, weight bearing, active movement and if indicated splinting of elbow and/or (if not a ‘mild’ case) wrist extension splint, with the thumb in opposition and to be worn for 3-4 hours at a time. | In a retrospective review of 191 sets of patient notes from 1981-1993. 186 children in study. Grouped into 5 categories to classify by severity of impairment. Assessed initially and at follow up. There was high correlation between the ‘impairment rating’ initially and on follow up, suggesting little change. When using McNemar’s test of symmetry, 72% of patient’s scores didn’t change, 31 patient improved by 1 grade, 2 improved by 2 grades and 8 patients deteriorated 1 grade. | Not all patients were splinted in the study (all but ‘mild’ cases were splinted) and splinting was not assessed in isolation ‘Mild cases’ were not defined. There was no control group. Compares initial and follow up exams, but does not say how long after the initial assessment the follow up exam was completed. |
Ho ES 2010 Canada | Children 0-18 years | Literature review and opinion | Noted that there is poor literature on wrist splinting of children for Erb’s Palsy, but that wrist splints were used with adults. Noted that in Ramos and Zell (Ramos LE, Zell JP (2000) Rehabilitation programme for children with brachial plexus and peripheral nerve injury. Seminars in Paediatric Neurology (7) 52-7) a static wrist splint for children with Erb’s Palsy who had a weak wrist and lacked finger extension was suggested. Found no papers with expert opinion (level 5) level of evidence to support this. Recommended the use of clinical reasoning to justify a rationale for splinting or not splinting. Considerations included avoiding restriction of movement where there may be nerve recovery, avoiding loss of range of movement where there is permanent damage and consideration of the impact of considering the effect of splinting on sensation, grasps and weight bearing. Noted that some infants had full recovery within 1 month from birth. Noted that clinical guidelines were needed in the use of splinting. | No results: only literature review | Not a study Only notes that other therapists have splinted the wrist of this patient group. Not specific to under three months |
Piatt JH 2004 USA | Infants and Children | Literature review. Not referenced or excluded in systematic review. | Noted that a wrist splint may be fabricated by the therapist to maintain wrist extension; however, it provided no justification, reference or evidence for this. | No results: literature review only | Not a study Only told us that other therapists have used wrist splinting in this patient group. Not specific to under three months |