Author, date and country | Patient group | Study type (level of evidence) | Outcomes | Key results | Study Weaknesses |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deare et al 2013 | Systematic Cochrane review | Systematic review of randomised and quasi-randomised studies evaluating any type of invasive acupuncture for fibromyalgia | FOR PAIN Acupuncture versus non-acupuncture treatment Acupuncture versus placebo or sham acupuncture Acupuncture versus medication Acupuncture as an adjunct therapy Deep needling with stimulation (T/S) versus deep needling without stimulation | Favours acupuncture (N=13) No significant difference (N=286) Favours acupuncture (N=38) Favours acupuncture as an adjunct (N=58) No significant difference (N=41) | Extensive search of many databases including Chinese. No language restrictions |
Casanueva et al 2014 Spain | 120 patients with fibromyalgia | Open-label randomised controlled trial (RCT): six sessions of weekly dry needling, 1 h per week+standard treatment (N=60) versus Standard treatment (N=60) | Visual analogue score for pain post-treatment | Dry needling 6.5 (2.1) Standard care 8.0 (1.3) p=0.002 | Multiple outcomes assessed Open label |
Collazo et al 2014 Spain | 99 patients with fibromyalgia | RCT Acupuncture versus moxibustion versus scalp acupuncture | Pain Scale | Pain scale showed the most improvement by 6 months in the scalp acupuncture group | This is a report from the abstract. It was not possible to source the paper No details given on the type of pain scale, the outcome data or statistical comparisons |
Khabbazi et al 2014 Iran | 90 patients with fibromyalgia | RCT: Acupuncture versus acupuncture+fluoxetine versus fluoxetine | Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire | Total number of symptoms were lowest in the acupuncture and the acupuncture+fluoxetine groups (p<0.0001) | Did not measure pain alone as an outcome Conference abstract only |
Stival et al 2014 Brazil | 36 patients with fibromyalgia from a rheumatology clinic | RCT: Acupuncture versus sham acupuncture | Mean change in visual analogue scale for pain (0–10) from before to after one session of treatment | Acupuncture −1.70±1.55 Sham −4.36±3.23 | Small sample |
Dias et al 2016 Brazil | 30 women with fibromyalgia from a pain clinic | Open-label RCT: Randomised to acupuncture versus electroacupuncture versus moxibustion | Wong-Baker Faces Pain Scale Number of tender points with pain-pressure threshold <4 kg/cm2 | No difference between modalities in either outcomes | Small sample size No placebo or sham therapy |