Author, date and country | Patient group | Study type (level of evidence) | Outcomes | Key results | Study Weaknesses |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benson et al, 1994 USA | 22 children representing 59 PIP joints with camptodactyly. They were categorised into 3 varieties of camptodactyly, Type1, Type 2 and Type 3. | A retrospective review. | Treatment was assessd by passive ROM measurements. Splinting and an OT programme were particularly effective for Type 1 patients. Splinting children with camptodactyly is an effective treatment. | All patients with Type 1 camptodactyly were treated with splinting. Average initial passive extension was -22.9 degrees compared to -4.3 degrees at a mean follow up of 36 months. Only 1 of the Type 2 patients followed the splinting protocol gaining full correction of -35 degrees. Type 3 patients showed an average of -23 to -1 degree after splinting. Children who are able to comply with a splinting and OT programme show improvements in PIP joint ROM and hand function. | Parents/carers play a large part in the therapy programme to achieve patient compliance, especially in the younger children |
Siegart et al. 1990 USA | 57 patients with camptodactyly. | A retrospective review. | Of the 38 digits treated operatively, 18% had good or excellent results. In comparison 41 digits were treated conservatively and had 66% good or excellent results. Operative treatment for children with severe and progressive camptodactyly should only be considered when conservative treatment hasn't been effective. | For the entire group of conservatively treated patients, the overall mean lack of extension at the PIP joint was 37 degrees before treatment and 16 degrees after treatment. Splinting children with camptodactyly is effective. | This paper compares splinting versus surgery for children with camptodactyly and so is not directly relevant. The conclusion however is relevant as there is evidence that splinting children with camptodactyly is effective. |
Miura et al. 1992 Japan | 62 patients with camptodactyly of the little finger | A retrospective review. | Out ot the 62 patients, only 5 cases failed to respond to conservative treatment. Conservative treatment by splinting is more effective than surgery and should be commenced as soon as possible. Surgery should only be carried out where conservative treatment has failed. | Conservative treatment by elastic splinting is more effective than operative treatment. Operative treatment should be used for failures of conservative treatment. | The results are not clearly presented. Results are described in very fine detail for 5 out of the 62 patients. |
Munetoshi Hori et al. 1987 Japan | 24 patients representing 34 joints with camptodactyly. | A retrospective study. | Improvement with dynamic splinting occurred in 29 fingers out of 34 fingers. 21 fingers showed almost full correction of the contracture after treatment by a dynamic splint. | The flexion contracture of 21 fingers were measured before and after treatment. The average flexion contracture was 40 degrees before splinting and 10 degrees after treatment. Dynamic splinting is an effective treatment for camptodactyly. | The results diagram is not clear. |