Author, date and country | Patient group | Study type (level of evidence) | Outcomes | Key results | Study Weaknesses |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Colvin JM et al 2007 USA | 379 children 3-12 years of age | Retrospective case note analysis | Appendicitis | Pain on hopping/jumping/coughing present in 67% confirmed cases appendicitis | Study split into 3 separate age groups (3-5.99 years, 6-8.99 years and 9-11.99 years). Only 15 confirmed cases in youngest age group. Criteria offered at hopping/coughing/jumping - no individual breakdown offered |
Appendicitis | Pain on hopping/coughing/jumping - 89% Sensitivity 66% specificity in 6-8.99 year age group | ||||
Appendicitis | Pain on hopping/coughing/jumping - 80% Sensitivity 70% specificity in 3-5.99 year age group | ||||
Appendicitis | Pain on hopping/coughing/jumping - 73% Sensitivity 51% specificity in 9-11.99 year age group | ||||
Samuel M 2002 UK | 1170 children aged 4-15 | Prospective study of common signs/symptoms looking to create a clinical scoring system for assessing possible appendicitis in children | Pain present on hopping/percussion/coughing | Sens 93%, Spec 100%, Positive Predictive Value 1, Negative Predictive Value 0.88 | Variables in score overlap with other pathology (eg urinary tract infection, gastroenteritis) Narrow proposed score cut-off Applied across wide range of ages High disease prevalence (63% not replicated in subsequent validation studies) |
Goldman D et al 2008 Canada | 849 children 1-17 | Prospective study, validation of proposals of Samuel | Appendicitis | Cough/percussion/hopping pain present in 72% of confirmed appendicitis 9% of non-appendicitis. Significant p value of<0.01 3rd most common finding in confirmed group after RIF pain (80%) and nausea/vomiting (75%) | Validation study of scoring system proposed by Samuel. Only 2 negative appendectomies Little statistical analysis of individual variables prevalence No analysis of cut-points proposed previously Disease prevalence 14% |
Bhatt et al, 2009, Canada | 246 children 4-18 | Prospective study, validation of proposals of Samuel | Appendicitis | Score <4 has 97.6% sensitivity and negative predictive value 97.7% and can be discharged Score of 8 has 95.1 specificity and positive predictive value 85.2% and should go to theatre Scores 5 to 7 diagnosis uncertain and require further imaging for diagnosis. | No analysis of prevalence of components of scoring system. Study looking at sens/spec of total scores Disease prevalence 34% |