Author, date and country | Patient group | Study type (level of evidence) | Outcomes | Key results | Study Weaknesses |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Henrikson CA et al 2003 USA | 459 consecutive patients admitted from the ED for chest pain who received NTG | Single-center, prospective observational cohort study | Relief of CP in 39% of total patients | 4 months clinical outcome were similar in patient with or without CP relief with NTG. Relief of chest pain after NTG does not predict active CAD and should not be used to guide diagnosis | Highly subjective self-reported pain using the scale of 0-10 which has many difficulties and interpretation and recall. Also there may be a work-up bias as physicians were aware of the CP response to NTG |
Relief of CP in 35% of patient with active CAD | |||||
Relief of CP in 41% of patient without active CAD | |||||
Steele R et al 2006 USA | 270 adult patients presenting to the ED with active chest pain who received NTG | Single-center, prospective cohort study | Relief of CP in 66% of total patients | NTG response had 72% sensitivity, 37% specificity, 34% PPV and 75% NPV for cardiac CP. Relief of CP with NTG does not distinguish between cardiac and non-cardiac CP. | Cannot eliminate selection bias based on exclusion criteria – excluding patients with lower likelihood of disease. While non-cardiac disease was defined as absence of objective findings, this does not completely rule out disease. |
Of those with relief – 34% had cardiac CP while 66% did not | |||||
Of those with no relief – 25% had cardiac CP and 75% did not | |||||
Diercks D et al 2005 USA | 664 consecutive chest pain patients in ED | Single center, prospective cohort study | Out of the total patients: 18% - cardiac related CP; 19% - no change; 31% - minimal reduction; 22% - moderate reduction; 28% - significant or complete reduction | No significant difference in overall response rates. The response of CP to NTG was not a reliable indicator of a cardiac etiology | Incomplete follow-up may have underestimated the predictive value of pain response to NTG. Assumptions that patient with a negative ECG and troponin I ruled out cardiac related CP though this may not completely rule out disease. The self-reporting numeric description pain scale is highly subjective. |