Author, date and country | Patient group | Study type (level of evidence) | Outcomes | Key results | Study Weaknesses |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Visnes & Bahr 2007 Norway | 7 studies (5 RCTs, 1 PRS, 1 CCT) | Critical Review | Pain – VAS (4 studies) | No attempt to pool data due to heterogenous nature of studies | Unable to pool data to perform meta-analysis due to hetergenous nature of studies. Poor quality studies included |
VISA (4 studies) | |||||
Return to sport (2 studies) | |||||
Patient satisfaction (1 study) | |||||
Wang et al 2007 Taiwan | N=50, 2 groups Group 1 – received extracorporeal shockwave. Group 2 – received NSAIDs, physiotherapy (including eccentric stretching and strengthening), exercise programmes and knee straps | RCT | Pain score | Group 1 – Significantly improved, Group 2 – no significant change | No description or record of physiotherapy exercise programme or method. No description of the method or use of the knee strap. Un-validated method of analysing the VISA results. |
Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment score | Group 1 - significantly improved Group 2 – no significant change | ||||
Ultrasonographic examination at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months and then once a year | No significant change in either group | ||||
Frome et al 2007 Sweden | N=20, 2 Groups Group 1 - bilateral eccentric overload strength training using the Bromsman device twice a week. Group 2 - unilateral eccentric body load training using a decline board twice a week, supplemented with daily home exercises. | Prospective RCT | Swedish Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment for Patella (VISA-P) score. | Both groups significantly improved. | Small sample size. No Blinding |
Warden et al 2008 Australia | N=37, 2 groups Group 1 – Eccentric decline squats exs programme with low intensity pulsed ultrasound. Group 2 – Eccentric decline squats exs programme without low intensity pulsed ultrasound. | RCT | Visual analogue scales for both usual (VAS-U) and worst (VAS-W) tendon pain. | VAS-U and VAS-W for the entire cohort decreased by 1.6-1.9 cm (P<0.01) and 2.5-2.4 cm (P<0.01), respectively. | No Control group. |
Kongsgaard et al 2009 Denmark | N=39 Group 1 (N=13) – received peritendinous corticosteroid injections (CORT) Group 2 (N=13) – Eccentric decline Squat (ECC) Group 3 (N=13) – Heavy slow resistence training (HSR) | RCT | VISA-p questionnaire | All groups significantly improved at 12 weeks. ECC & HSR results maintained at 6 months. CORT scores decreased at 6 months. (P<0.05) | Small sample size. Self selected patients may lead to biasing. |
Tendon pain during activity (VAS) | All groups significantly improved at 12 weeks. ECC & HSR results maintained at 6 months. CORT scores decreased at 6 months. (P<0.05) | ||||
Treatment satisfaction | Four CORT (36% of responders), two ECC (22% of responders) and eight HSR subjects (73% of responders) were satisfied at the half-year follow-up. | ||||
Tendon swelling | Decreased in CORT and HSR (-13±9%, P<0.01) | ||||
Tendon vascularization | Decreased in CORT and HSR (-52±49% and -43%±23%, P<0.01) | ||||
Tendon mechanical properties | Tendon mechanical properties were similar in healthy and injured tendons and were unaffected by treatment. | ||||
Collagen crosslink properties | HSR yielded an elevated collagen network turnover. |