Author, date and country | Patient group | Study type (level of evidence) | Outcomes | Key results | Study Weaknesses |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ed Day et al 2008 UK | (Cochrane Review) Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in which treatment with thiamine or thiamine-containing products was administered and compared with alternative interventions for people with or at risk of developing, Wernicke-Korsakoff Syndrome (WKS) secondary to alcohol abuse. (The specialist Register of Cochrane dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group (CDCIG) was searched upto December 2005. The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, LILACS were searched separately from December 2005 to January 2008). 2-studies identified but only one contained sufficient data for quantitative analysis. | Level 1a : Systematic review and meta-analysis | Learning and memory | Ambrose 2001, 200 mg/day thiamine (i.m.) vs 5mg/day. MD – 17.90 95% CI – 35.4 to -0.40 P = 0.04 | One study had sufficient data for qualitative analysis; the other study (Nichols et al unpublished) had insufficient data for full analysis. Even in study which is analysed (Ambrose 2001) 25% dropped out and focus on group without the classical triad of symptoms of WKS. Delayed alteration test, used as main outcome in Ambrose 2001 but there is no report how this was done. Assessment of further outcomes has not been described in this study as well. Nichols et al (unpublished) results undermined by small number of participants and limited reporting of data. Also it describes the group with history of chronic alcohol abuse and evidence of neuropsychological memory impairment but did not describe the presence or absence of other symptoms of WKS. |
Global Confusional state, nystagmus, ataxia, gaze palsies. | Ambrose 2001, did not report the effect of thiamine treatment on these outcomes. | ||||
Deaths | Ambrose 2001, No deaths reported. | ||||
Adverse effects | Ambrose 2001, No adverse effects recorded | ||||
Nichols et al (unpublished) used Buschke CLTR and delayed Recall when compared with baseline in groups treated with thiamine 5 g/day orally showed significant improvements. Participants in placebo group failed to show improvement in any measures. | |||||
Thomson A.D. et al 2002 UK | Recommendations from Royal College of Physicians for management of patients in the Accident and Emergency (A&E) who may possibly have or are at risk of developing, Wernicke’s Encephalopathy (WE). There is no simple blood test to determine patients at risk of WE. | Guidelines | Patients with evidence of chronic alcohol misuse and any of following: Acute confusion, Decreased conscious level, Ataxia, Ophthalmoplegia Memory disturbance, Hypothermia with hypotension | Intravenous (i.v.) vitamin B complex (Pebrinex) 2 pairs of vials should be given over 30 minutes in A&E. | |
If patient is admitted, consider 2 pairs of vials 3 times daily for 2 days, (if any improvement), followed by one pair daily for 5 days (i.v. or i.m.) | |||||
All hypoglycaemic patients with chronic alcohol ingestion must be given i.v.Pebrinax immediately because of precipitating WE | |||||
Cook C.C. 2000 UK | Author compares the oral and Parenteral vitamins supplements for prophylaxis and effective treatment of Wernicke’s Encephalopathy | Level 5: Journal article (Expert opinion based on physiology, bench research) | Recommendation based upon published literature; Prophylaxis of WE. | 1. Prophylactic treatment should be offered to all inpatients undergoing alcohol withdrawal. | Literature review of same subject an year before this article & recommendations for prophylactic & treatment of WE |
2. Recommended prophylaxis against development of WE, one pair of i.m. high potency parenteral B-complex vitamins once daily for 3-5 days (Bligh and Madden, 1983). | |||||
Hope et al 1999 UK | Questionnaires sent in January 1997 to 1598 UK physicians involved in chronic alcohol misusers. Questionnaires designed to elicit current practice, involvement, and opinions about management of chronic alcohol misusers. | Questionnaire Survey | Vitamin B1 (Thiamine) important in treatment of chronic alcohol abusers | 88% Psychiatrists vs 54% A&E specialists | The response rate was low (25%), which hardly represents the full spectrum of population of interest. High level of non-response by A&E specialists which is leading to bias results. Study was unable to establish the practice regarding the dosage levels given in treatment. |
Route of administration for Vitamin B | Oral vs Parenteral | ||||
In chronic alcohol misusers | Psychiatrists 66% vs 9% (20% preferred both oral & parenteral routes) A&E 14% vs 35% (10% preferred both) | ||||
In patients at risk to develop WE. | Psychiatrists 7% vs 76% (4% preferred both routes) A&E 2% vs 53% (0% preferred both) | ||||
Restricting the use of parenteral vitamin B because of allergy or anaphylaxis | Psychiatrists 70% vs A&E 18% | ||||
Parenteral vitamin B complex in chronic alcoholic patients presenting with -Confusion | Psychiatrists 19% vs A&E 4% | ||||
-Ataxia | Psychiatrists 19% vs A&E 6% | ||||
-Ophthalmoplegia | Psychiatrists 22% vs A&E 9% | ||||
Cook CC et al 1998 UK | This review evaluates the research literature, B vitamins in the aetiology and treatment of neuropsychiatric syndromes associated with alcohol misuse, with particular emphasis on Wernicke’s Encephalopathy; and makes recommendations for clinical management of such patients. | Level 2a: Systematic review of literature | Prevalence of Wernicke’s Encephalopathy (WE) in alcoholics (post-mortem | Torvik et al., (1982) 12.5% | No qualitative analysis only literature review done. Review included neuropsychiatric conditions associated with alcohol misuse; not focussed on WE or WKS. |
Incidence of WE and /or Cerebellar atrophy | Torvik et al., (1982); Victor et al., (1989) Appx. 35%. | ||||
Parenteral vs Oral B vitamin supplementation | Thomson et al., (1970); Greenwood et al.,(1985b); Thomson (1990); In malnourished alcoholics the oral absorption of thiamine is reduced (30% compared to healthy individuals ie. Maximum 1.5mg of thiamine can be absorbed from a single dose of 10mg or more. Chataway and Hardman, (1995); described development of WE in alcoholics on oral high dose vitamin B supplements. Baines et al., (1988); oral 50mg thiamine vs i.m. 250 mg thiamine daily for 5 days, The levels of thiamine were more elevated in group which received thiamine i.m. Baker and Frank, (1976); Thomson et al (1983); showed that in contrast to parenterally administration, oral administration neither elevate thiamine activity in cerebrospinal fluid nor restored transketolase activity, in alcoholics with thiamine deficiency. | ||||
Prophylaxis of WE in alcoholics | Majumdar, (1980); Prophylactic regime of one pair of high potency vitamin B complex once daily for 5 days in at risk alcoholics undergoing detoxification; was clinically effective in preventing the development of WE. |