Three Part Question
In [a laboring, uncomplicated pregnant woman who is full term, singleton, and otherwise healthy,] would the [risk of neonatal infections] be increased in [water birth versus bed birth]?
Clinical Scenario
A 34-year-old Caucasian female presents to labor and delivery in active labor. She desires to have a water birth. She is G3P2. She had a bed birth for her first child and a water birth with her second child. During delivery, the water becomes very clouded and dirty. You wonder if the baby has increased risk of infection after contact with this dirty water.
Search Strategy
Medline 1966-present using the OVID interface.
[water birth OR immersion OR labor]. No limits.
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews using OVID interface
[immersion] OR [water birth]. No limits.
Search Outcome
17 papers found of which 6 irrelevant and 8 of insufficient quality for inclusion.
Relevant Paper(s)
Author, date and country |
Patient group |
Study type (level of evidence) |
Outcomes |
Key results |
Study Weaknesses |
Zanetti-Daellenbach R et al 2007 Switzerland | 513 patients desiring water birth
Delivery in water vs delivery on bed after temporary immersion vs delivery on bed after no immersion
| Prospective Observational Study
2b (Etiology/Harm)
1b (Prognosis)
| Neonatal infection | No difference except for conjunctivitis between water birth and no immersion groups | Length of study
One institution – limited patient sample |
Geissbuhler V et al 2000 Switzerland | 5484 spontaneous singleton births in cephalic presentation
Water birth vs Maia-birthing stool vs Bed birth
| Prospective Observational Study
2b (Etiology/Harm)
1b (Prognosis) | Neonatal Infection | No difference | No specific demographic information
One institution – limited patient sample
No mention of water cleanliness
First few days after birth
|
Thoeni A et al 2005 Italy | Women desiring water birth.
Water births, “air” births (bed and stool) | Review Study
2c (Etiology/Harm)
4 (Prognosis)
| Neonatal Infection | No difference | Length of study
One institution – limited patient sample
No demographic data |
Comment(s)
There are 2 good prospective observational studies and one rather poor review article. All three demonstrated no difference in neonatal infection rate with water birth - except for conjunctivitis in one study. However, standard protocol in the US is the use of prophylactic antibiotic eye ointment so this would be expected not to be much of concern here.
Clinical Bottom Line
Risk of neonatal infection does not appear to be increased with water birth versus bed birth but more evidence is needed before one can confidently form this conclusion.
References
- Zanetti-Daellenbach R et al Maternal and neonatal infections and obstetrical outcome in water birth. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology September 2007; 134(1):37-43
- Geissbuhler V et al Waterbirths: A comparative study. A prospective study on more than 2,000 waterbirths. Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy 2000; 15(5):291-300
- Thoeni A et al Review of 1600 water births. Does water birth increase the risk of neonatal infection? The Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine 2005: 17:357-361