Author, date and country | Patient group | Study type (level of evidence) | Outcomes | Key results | Study Weaknesses |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mol, B., M.D., et al. January 1999 Netherlands | 382 women with suspected ectopic pregnancy, based on positive urine pregnancy test and presence of abdominal pain, vaginal bleeding, or risk indicators. | A prospective study evaluating the likelihood ratio (LR) of ectopic pregnancy using various abnormalities found on abdominal, speculum and digital examination as compared to transvaginal ultrasound and serum beta-HCG. | LR of ectopic pregnancy normal speculum exam 0.77 | Normal speculum exam 45/116 patient with ectopic pregnancy. Normal speculum exam 10/43 patients with miscarriage | This study calculated likelihood ratios of ectopic pregnancy based on physical exam findings. This was based on final diagnosis made with ultrasound and serum beta-HCG. It did not show if the physical exam findings would or should change the physician's management or diagnosis. |
LR of ectopic pregnancy with rebound tenderness on abdominal exam 3.7 | 24/118 patients with ectopic pregnancy had rebound tenderness. | ||||
LR of ectopic pregnancy with muscle rigidity on abdominal exam 8.0 | 7/116 patients with ectopic pregnancy had muscular rigidity. Only 2 other women had this sign. | ||||
Hoey, R., Allan, K. July 2004 United Kingdom | 236 stable women less than 20 weeks gestation with vaginal bleeding and no known cervical carcinoma. | A prospective study that allowed physicians to fill out a questionnaire regarding their diagnosis and managment plan following digital exam and then again following speculum exam. | 1.3% (3 patients) had a change in management based on speculum exam | Original management plan was for ultrasound. After speculum exam the plan changed to gynecological referral. The reasons were as follows: open cervical os and products of conception visualized, amniotic fluid visualized, and patient request. | Results are based on physician questionnaire, which in itself may have an element of error based on truthfulness of reporting. Does not address other causes of bleeding such as carcinoma. |
4.2% (10 patients) had a change in diagnosis following speculum exam. | 7/10 women diagnosis was changed from threatened abortion to inevitable abortion. 1/10 missed abortion changed to threatened abortion. 1/10 unsure diagnosis changed to inevitable abortion. 1/10 inevitable abortion changed to threatened abortion. | ||||
Chilaka, V., et al. July 2000 United Kingdom | 564 women presenting with antepartum hemorrhage. | Prospective observational study evaluating findings of speculum exam, pregnancy complications and outcomes, and level of physician performing exam. | Most speculum exams did not contribute to a clinically significant diagnosis | 69% were normal exams, 21.3% showed cervical ectopy. | The study did not give gestational age of presenting patients. It did not address miscarriange as requiring significant intervention. |
None of the speculum exams revealed a diagnosis that resulted in a significant intervention. | 0% revealed a significant carcinoma. |