Author, date and country | Patient group | Study type (level of evidence) | Outcomes | Key results | Study Weaknesses |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lee et al, 2005, Korea | 80 OPCAB patients divided into ACEI group (n=43) and control group (n=37) | Case control study (level 3b) | Haemodynamic parameters measured at 5 points after pericardiotomy (T1), 10 min after the application of stabiliser to perform anastomoses of LAD (T2), OM (T3), and RCA (T4), and after pericardial suturing (T5) | No significant difference in the haemodynamic parameters measured were detected between the two groups, except for cardiac output, which was found to be significantly greater in the control group (P<0.05) | Small sample size Non-randomised design Multiple confounding factors such as diabetes, hypertension which can affect haemodynamic parameters |
Volume of noradrenaline infused during T2 | Control group: 22.7±28.9 µg vs. ACEI group: 35.8±54.8 µg (P=ns) | ||||
Volume of noradrenaline infused during T3 | Control group: 39.8±47.3 µg vs. ACEI group: 73.7±92.8 µg (P<0.05) | ||||
Volume of noradrenaline infused during T4 | Control group: 39.8±41.8 µg vs. ACEI group: 63.2±87.3 µg (P=ns) | ||||
Total volume of noradrenaline infused | Control group: 92.1±95.5 µg vs. ACEI group: 198.8±237.0 µg (P<0.05) | ||||
Devbhandari et al, 2004, UK | Survey of 167 practicing UK cardiac surgeons. 105 responded | National Survey (level 5) | % age who felt benefit of stoppage of ACEI prior to cardiac surgery | 39% | 63% response rate Only UK surgeons surveyed |
% age who felt that the use of ACEI leads to vasodilation resulting in increased usage of fluids, inotropes and vasoconstrictors | 63% | ||||
% age who felt it was harmful to stop ACEI prior to cardiac surgery | 38% | ||||
% age that actually practiced stoppage of ACEI prior to cardiac surgery made no difference | 20% | ||||
% age that actually practiced stoppage of ACEI prior to cardiac surgery | 39% | ||||
Bertrand et al, 2001, France | 37 patients chronically treated with AIIA for hypertension undergoing major vascular surgery were randomly assigned to two groups Group I: AIIA discontinued on the day before surgery (n=18) Group II: AIIA given 1 hr before anaesthesia (n=19) | RCT (level 1b) | Haemodynamic variables during induction of anaesthesia | Systolic arterial pressure was significantly decreased in Group II at 5, 15 and 23 mins after induction of anaesthesia (P<0.05) | Haemodynamic study ended at incision |
Episodes of hypotension | AIIA withdrawn: 1 ± 1; AIIA given: 2±1 (P<0.01) | ||||
Patients developing at least 1 episode of hypertension | AIIA withdrawn: 12; AIIA given: 19 (P<0.01) | ||||
Duration of an episode of hypotension | AIIA withdrawn: 3 ± 4 min: AIIA given: 8 ± 7 min (P<0.01) | ||||
Dose of ephedrine (mg) | AIIA withdrawn: 10 ± 10; AIIA given 15 ± 9 (P=NS) | ||||
Dose of neosynephrine (ug) | AIIA withdrawn 0 ± 0; AIIA given: 47 ± 86 (P<0.05) | ||||
Dose of terlipressin (mg) | AIIA withdrawn: 0 ± 0; AIIA given: 0.3 ± 0.5 (P<0.01) | ||||
Mekontso-Dessap et al, 2001, France | 36 patients undergoing CABG who developed vasoplegic shock (VS) were compared with 72 control patients without post-CPB cardiogenic or VS | Case control study (level 3b) | Multivariate logistic regression analysis to identify predisposing factors for the development of VS after CPB independent of ventricular function | Preoperative ACEI and IV heparin were independent predictors for post-CPB VS (relative risk of 2.26 and 2.78 respectively) | Small sample size Non-randomised design |
Carrel et al, 2000, Switzerland | 800 consecutive patients undergoing elective CABG and/or valve replacement | Cohort study (level 2b) | Incidence of postoperative low SVR | 21.8% | Non-randomised design |
Multivariate logistic regression analysis to identify predisposing factors for the development of postoperative low SVR after CPB | Temperature and duration of CPB, total cardioplegic volume infused, reduced left ventricular function, and preoperative treatment with ACEI were predictive factors for early postoperative vasoplegia | ||||
Piggott et al, 1999, UK | 40 patients with good left ventricular function undergoing CABG, allocated randomly to continue ACE inhibitor medication before surgery (Group 1: n=20) or omit (Group 2: n=20) | RCT (level 1a) | Haemodynamic measurements of heart rate and arterial pressure were made at the following times: on the ward before surgery; before and after induction of anaesthesia; after intubation; before and after sternotomy; before cannulation of the aorta; after weaning from CPB; at skin closure; on admission to cardiac recovery; and hourly for the first 2 h in the cardiac recovery unit | Arterial pressure measured in the ward before surgery before surgery (before omitting ACE inhibitors) was similar in both groups (P=NS), but patients in group 2 had a significantly greater mean arterial pressure over the whole study compared to patients in group 1 (P<0.05) | Small sample size Only patients with good left ventricular function were recruited |
Measurements of cardiac output, CVP, SVR, and PAWP were first performed after induction of anaesthesia and before commencement of surgery and thereafter at the same intervals as above | There was no sig difference between groups in heart rate, CVP or PAWP There was an overall increase in SVR in group 2, particularly noticeable after CPB (P<0.05) | ||||
No of patients needing metaraminol after induction | Group 1: 3; group 2: 1 (P=ns) | ||||
No of patients needing epinephrine after CPB | Group 1: 2; group 2: 1 (P=ns) | ||||
No of patients needing norepinephrine after CPB | Group 1: 2; group 2: 1 (P=ns) | ||||
No of patients needing GTN after CPB | Group 1: 7; group 2: 16 (P<0.05) | ||||
GTN total (mg) | Group 1: 10.7±3.6; group 2: 21.6±13.0 (P<0.05) | ||||
Metaraminol total (mg) | Group 1: 8.6±3.7; group 2: 5.2±1.9 (P<0.05) | ||||
Boeken et al, 1999, Germany | 240 patients undergoing CABG or valve surgery were divided into 3 matched groups (group A: pre and postoperative ACEI; group B:ACEI only pre-, not postoperatively; group C: no ACEI) | Case control study (level 3b) | The need for catecholamines | Intraop. A: 35%, B: 35%, C: 15%; postop. A: 21.2%, B: 16.2%, C: 10% (P<0.05) | Non-randomised design Patients with post-operative ACEI therapy also included |
The incidence of a 'post-perfusion syndrome' or systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) | In the ACEI groups (A and B) there were 9 patients with a postoperative SIRS, only 2 cases in group C | ||||
The incidence of impaired intestinal microcirculation | 4 patients of group B | ||||
Webb et al, 1998, UK | 96 patients undergoing CABG were randomised to quinapril 20 mg (n=47) once daily or placebo (n=49) in double-blind fashion, continued for up to 6 weeks prior to operation | RCT (level 1b) | Measurement of Left Ventricular function at the start of the study | Quinapril group: 54.9 (13.8)% vs. Placebo group: 55.6 (13.2)% (P=ns) | Small sample size |
Measurement of Left Ventricular function 3 months following surgery, after recommencement of pre-surgery anti-anginal therapy for 1 week | Quinapril group: 58.1 (13.6)% vs. Placebo group: 56.9 (12.6)% (P=ns) | ||||
Effects on systematic vascular resistance (SVR) during bypass were calculated from perfusion records and vasoconstrictor use | The intra-operative BP and the SVR during bypass in the two treatment groups were not significantly different (Ps0.94) | ||||
The safety of the addition of quinapril to the anti-anginal regimen was assessed by measurement of systemic blood pressure (BP) after the first dose of study medication, measurement of intra-operative BP, administration of inotropes and any intra-operative complications | No first dose hypotension 42 patients in the placebo group and 40 patients in the quinapril group required inotropes (P=ns) | ||||
Deakin et al, 1998, UK | 62 patients undergoing CABG divided into two groups: ACEI group (n=21) and control (n=41) | Case control study (level 3b) | SVR was calculated at 1 min intervals during the rewarming phase of hypothermic CPB | Mean SVR in the ACE group was 978 dyne/s per cm5 and in the control group was 1194 dyne/s per cm5 (Ps0.006) | Small sample size Non-randomised design The study did not distinguish whether the observed hypotension was a result of low SVR or low cardiac output |
Mean arterial pressure | Mean arterial pressure was 48.8 mmHg in the ACE group and 56.3 mmHg in the control group (Ps0.004) | ||||
The use of vasoactive drugs during and immediately after termination of CPB was recorded | There was a significant difference in vasoactive drug requirements between the groups (P-0.01) | ||||
Licker et al, 1996, Switzerland | Patients with preserved left ventricular function undergoing mitral valve replacement or CABG were divided into two groups according to preoperative drug therapy: patients receiving ACE inhibitors for at least 3 months ACEI group, (n=22) and those receiving analysis other cardiovascular drug therapy control group (n=19) | Case control study (level 3b) | Systemic haemodynamic variables were recorded before surgery, after anaesthesia induction, during sternotomy, after aortic cross clamping, after aortic unclamping, as well as after separation from CPB and during skin closure | At no time did the systemic haemodynamics and the need for vasopressor support differ between the two treatment groups | Small sample size Non-randomised study design |
Dose of fentanyl and midazolam needed for induction | Significantly less fentanyl and midazolam were given in the ACEI group (P-0.05) | ||||
Blood was sampled repeatedly up to 24 h after surgery for hormone analysis | Plasma renin activity was significantly greater in the ACEI group throughout the whole 24 hours study period Plasma concentrations of angiotensin II did not differ between the two groups Similar changes in catecholamines angiotensin II, and plasma renin activity were found in the two groups in response to surgery and CPB The pressor and constrictor effects of norepinephrine infusion were attenuated markedly in the ACEI group: the dose-response curves were shifted to the right and the slopes were decreased at the two study periods | ||||
Determination of PD (20) of norepinephrine during hypothermic CPB | ACEI group: 0.08 µ/kg vs. control group: 0.03 µ/kg (P-0.05) | ||||
Determination of PD (20) of norepinephrine after separation from CPB | ACEI group: 0.52 µ/kg vs. control group: 0.1 µ/kg (P-0.05) In both groups, PD (20) was significantly less during hypothermic CPB than in the period immediately after CPB | ||||
Turman et al, 1995, USA | 4301 patients undergoing elective CABG and/or valve surgery divided into two groups:ACEI group (n=512) and control group (n=3782) | Case-control study (level 3b) | Influence of chronic preoperative ACE inhibitor use and other perioperative factors on the incidence of vasoconstrictor therapy required to maintain systolic blood pressure at more than 85 mmHg despite a normal cardiac output after CPB | At least two vasoconstrictor infusions (phenylephrine, norepinephrine, or dopamine) were required for low perfusion pressure despite adequate cardiac output after CPB in 7.7% of 519 ACE-inhibited patients and 4.0% of 3782 patients not receiving ACE inhibitors (P=0.0001). In the first 4 h after arrival in the ITU, the need for vasoconstrictor infusions to treat hypotension with adequate cardiac output did not differ. In the first 4 h after arrival in the ITU, more ACE inhibited patients (6.4%) exhibited low values of SVR (<600 dyne.s.cm5) than patients not receiving ACE inhibitors (2.8%; P=0.0002) | Large sample size Non-randomised design Interaction between opioid anaesthesia and ACE inhibitors may enhance the vasodilator response |
Logistic regression analysis to determine risk factors requiring 2 vasoconstrictor infusions after CPB | Preoperative ACE inhibitor use, congestive heart failure, poor left ventricular function, duration of CPB, reoperative surgery, age, and opioid anaesthesia |