Author, date and country | Patient group | Study type (level of evidence) | Outcomes | Key results | Study Weaknesses |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Herrington et al Jan 2005 UK | 36 asymptomatic females divided equally into a pilates group, a abdominal curl group and a non training group | Transverse abdominis isolation test | 83% pass from pilates group, 33% pass from the abdominal curl group and 25% pass from the non training group | Small group size. Could have performed a true RCT if the patients were symptomatic. Not specifically answering the question but related. | |
Lumbo-pelvic stability | 42% pass from the pilates group with all others failing | ||||
Gladwell V, Head S, Haggar M and Beneke R Nov 2006 | 49 participants with chronic low back pain were randomly allocated to control (n=24) or Pilates group (n=25). 34 subjects completed the study (14 and 20 individuals for control and Pilates group, respectively). Pilates group underwent a 6-week program of pilates. Both groups continued with normal activities throughout the study. | A blinded assessor conducted functional and questionnaire-based assessments pre- and post intervention. | Pilates group | Significant improvement in general health, sports functioning, flexibility, proprioception and a decrease in pain. | Small sample size used and not a double blinded RCT. |
Control group | No significant differences seen in general health, sports functioning, flexibility, proprioception and a decrease in pain. | ||||
Rydeard R, Leger A and Smith D Jul 2006 Canada | Thirty-nine physically active subjects between 20 and 55 years old with chronic LBP were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups. The specific-exercise-training group participated in a 4-week program consisting of training on specialized (Pilates) exercise equipment, while the control group received the usual care, defined as consultation with a physician and other specialists and healthcare professionals, as necessary. | A randomized controlled trial, pretest-posttest design, with a 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up. Objectives of the study is to investigate the efficacy of a therapeutic exercise approach in a population with chronic low back pain (LBP) by measuring Functional disability outcomes with The Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMQ/RMDQ-HK) and average pain intensity using a 101-point numerical rating scale pre and post exercise program. | Pilates group | significantly lower level of functional disability (P = .023) and average pain intensity (P = .002). Improved disability scores in the specific exercise-training group were maintained for up to 12 months following treatment intervention. | Small sample size, single blinded RCT. |
Control group | No significant decrease seen in level of functional disability and average pain intensity | ||||
Gagnon LH 2005 USA | Twelve subjects who presented for physical therapy with low back pain (LBP), were randomly assigned to either the traditional lumbar stabilization exercise group (A, n = 6) or the Pilates exercise group (B, n = 6) and completed participation in the study. | The purpose of this research was to investigate the efficacy of Pilates exercises as a therapeutic intervention in treatment of low back pain (LBP). Pilates exercises have been integrated into many rehabilitation programs for those with LBP; however, no clinical research was found that supports its efficacy. Outcome measures used were the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), the Revised Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), lumbar spine active range of motion (AROM), and measures of core stability on the Stability Platform (LaFayette Instrument Co), taken at pre-treatment, every fourth visit and at discharge from physical therapy. | There were no significant differences in any of the outcome measures between the groups over time. | Extremely small sample size to demonstrate anything significant, if significant findings were found, relevance of such findings would be questionned. |