Author, date and country | Patient group | Study type (level of evidence) | Outcomes | Key results | Study Weaknesses |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mustajoki P, Heinonen J 1980 Finland | 37 patients with acute porphyria who received various anaesthetics (including thiopenal, ketamine, hexobarbitol) on 62 occasions. There were 32 exposures to succinylcholine. 14 patients with acute porphyria who recieved anaesthetics during an acute attack on 16 occasions. 6 exposures to succinylcholine. | Retrospective case series. Data from hospital records and questionaires. Level 3 evidence. | Number of patients with symptoms suggestive of an acute attack (in patients not having an acute attack) | No acutes attack occured. | No data on urinary PBG Potentially porphyrinogenic anesthetics used alongside succinylcholine. |
Exacerbation of the attack (in patients who were having an acute attack) | Exacerbation of acute attack in 4 cases with death in 1 case-however these patients all recieved thiopental, known to exacerbate porphyria | ||||
Dover SB, Plenderleith, Moore MR, Mc Coll KEL 1994 UK | 25 patients with acute porphyria undergoing 38 surgical operations under general anaesthetic.30 operations were performed in 20 patients with AIP,7 in 4 patients with variegate porphyria and one in a patient with hereditary coproporphyria. 19 patients were known to have porphyria and 8 were undiagnosed at the time of surgery.Suxamethonium was given on 10 occasions to the patients previously diagnosed with porphyria. | Combined retrospective and prospective case study. 5 patients (known to have porphyria) had ALA and PBJ measured perioperatively for variable durations between days -2 and 7 and any symptoms of an acute attack were noted in all patients. | Symptoms suggestive of an acute attack | None of the patients known to have porphyria at the time of surgery had symptoms of an acute attack but of the patients with undiagnosed porphyria 7 had crisis, 2 resulting in death (not reported if suxamethonium had been used in any of these cases). | The data was incomplete-only 5 patients had urinary PBG and ALA measured perioperatively and for variable amounts of time.There was no mention of the drugs each of these 5 patients recieved. The basic data was not adequately described-no exact figures were given-only a roughly drawn diagram and terms such as 'a transient rise (in PBG)' and '(PBG) nearly doubled' used when describing the perioperative changes in PBG and ALA. No statistical analysis was performed. Numbers do not add up. It says that the study was conducted in 25 patients but later says that 19 patients had diagnosed porphyria and 8 had undiagnosed porphyria at the time of the operation. |
Urinary PBG excretion | 3 of the 5 patients with their PBG monitored had a 'transient rise' in ABG. | ||||
Urinary ALA excretion | 2 of the 5 patients with their ALA monitored showed increased ALA excretion-one more than 4 times the upper limit of normal and one within normal limits | ||||
Meissner, P.N., Harrison GG, Hift RJ. 1991 South Africa | 13 patients with variegate porphyria requring general anaesthesia for elective surgery. Suxamethonium or atracurium were used for muscle relaxation. (All were given IV propofol.Other drugs recieved were fentanyl, alfentil and morphine were also used.) | Case series. Level 3 evidence. | Number of patients with symptoms suggestive of an acute attack after administration of propofol | No patients suffered symptoms suggestive of an acute attack of porphyria | Case series Level 3 |
Urinary ALA, PBG measured on day before operation-day 0, day 1, day 3 and day 5 | No significant increase in concentrations of ALA and PBG |