Author, date and country | Patient group | Study type (level of evidence) | Outcomes | Key results | Study Weaknesses |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bossi et al 2004 Italy | Unselected serum and plasma specimens referred to the virology laboratory for HCV-RNA between 1997-2000 | Diagnostic study | Qualitative HCV-RNA determination compared with 2 types of | 888 samples were assayed, 579 (65.2%) were +ve for HCV-RNA, anti-HCV was detected in 802 sera by MEIA (90.3%) and in 783 by immunoblot (706 +ve and 77 indeterminate, 88.2%). The anti-core antibodies displayed the best correlation with viraemia i.e. 97.1% of the PCR+ samples, followed by anti-NS3 (90.2%) and anti-NS4 (89.6%). Only one +ve HCV-RNA was –ve by immunoblot and MEIA (early seroconversion | Small no. of samples to verify the overall specificity of MEIA |
Wang TY et al 2002 China | 14 subjects following needlestick injury in which the source patients were +ve for both anti-HCV and HCV-RNA | Prospective diagnostic study | Use of HCV-PCR instead of an anti-HCV test for earlier and more effective detection of HCV | Out of the 14 incidence of subjects exposed to HCV following NSI from HCV +ve sources, they were all negative for anti-HCV at the time of incident. In one of the exposed subjects, a nurse, the result of HCV-PCR was +ve at 2 weeks after the NSI. The nurses viral load was very low (800 copies/ml) and she responded well to immediate treatment and never developed acute HCV. Her anti-HCV did not become elevated and results for RNA-PCR were negative following treatment. In the other 13 NSI, the results of PCR tests were negative for HCV-RNA throughout the study | Small sample size |
Hitzler WE et al 2001 Germany | Blood donations over 4 yrs were screened for HCV-RNA using two commercial HCV-PCR kits | Diagnostic study | The feasibility and efficacy of routine screening of blood donations for HCV-RNA | 251,737 blood donations were screened over 4 yrs by pool testing. With a maximum pool size of 40 serum samples. 3 donations out of 251,737 were HCV-RNA +ve and anti-HCV negative. The HCV infection of a fourth HCV-RNA +ve donor could not be identified by routine 2nd generation HCV EIA. Two previous donotions were also HCV-RNA +ve but the enzyme immunoassay screening test systems could not detect anti-HCV | |
Garinis G et al 1999 Greece | 161 haemodialysis (HD) patients, mean age 43.3 range 25.3-61.83, 83 males and 78 females were examined 3 times over 1.5 yrs | Diagnostic study | To compare the anti-HCV and HCV-RNA screening results using ELISA III and qualitative RNA-PCR respectively. All samples were then confirmed by RIBA 3rd (Recombinant immunoblot 3rd generation assay) | 161 HD pts were anti-HCV tested by the ELISA III and confirmed by RIBA 3rd. HCV-RNA was determined by PCR. Reported results obtained from ELISA III and PCR assays were HCV +ve for 16/161 pts (9.93%).These 16/161 were subsequently confirmed by the RIBA 3rd. For three individuals anti-HCV(-)/RIBA(+)/HCV RNA(-),the viral load was less than the assay detection level (<2,000 viral copies/ml) | Comparison of the enyme-Linked Immunosorbant Assay III, Recombinant Immunoblot 3rd Generation Assay, and PCR method in the detection of HCV infection in haemodialysis patients. Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis. 13:122-125 (1999) |