Author, date and country | Patient group | Study type (level of evidence) | Outcomes | Key results | Study Weaknesses |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rose E A, Deshikachar A M, Schwartz K L et al Jul-Aug 2001 USA | 50 patients who presented with a sore throat between to a family practice. Those with more complex problems were excluded. A new template was introduced which advised the following: if low likelihood of GABHS-symptomatic treatment moderate likelihood-perform a strep test and treat accordingly high likelihood-empirical treatment with antibiotics A control group was taken from visits for pharyngitis in the 6 months before the study was undertaken, this was converted from the previous notes to the template by auditors. | diagnostic study | Antibiotics not indicated but given | For patients with a moderate probability of GABHS: template used: 44% v 54% without.(not signif p=0.319) Low probability of GABHS 10% v 71% (p less than 0.05) | The small sample size makes generalizations very difficult. The auditors converting the previous notes to the template would have been subjective and had to 'fit' the notes into the template. |
Antibiotics indicated but not given | For patients with a high prob of GABHS. using template: 10% v 0% .Moderate prob 0% v 0% | ||||
Diaz MC, Symons N, Ramundo M et al Oct 2004 USA | All patients who came to the Emergency department with pharyngitis were identified and a random sample of 300 patients were chosen. Of these 219 met the study criteria and were included. An evidence based guideline was developed and implemented which advised that if there was a high suspicion of GABHS, both a rapid strep test and throat culture should be performed. 224 patients were included in the post intervention group. | controlled clinical trial | % of patients receiving appropriate treatment pre and post intervention | 44% pre vs 91% post intervention | This study had no patient follow up to assess how effective the treatment had been for the patient. The data was not analysed in depth with no p values to assess significance of the findings. |
choice of antibiotics for positive RST result | pre 37.5% penicillin vs 70.8% post. pre 55% given amoxicillin vs 10% post. pre 6% given azithromycin(because allergic to penicillin) vs 0% post. The remaining 16% post were given a macrolide or clindamycin owing to penicllin allergy. 1 patient was give amoxicillin and clavulanate. | ||||
McIsaac WJ, Butler CC 2000 Canada | 584 patients over 3 years old presenting with Upper Respiratory Infections. Physicians completed a standardized clinical assessment and took a single throat swab from each patient. They also noted whether an antibiotic was prescribed and what they believed the likelihood of GABHS infection was. The gold standard was throat culture | diagnostic study. | unnecessary antibiotics prescribed | 70/105 (66.7%) | 45% participation rate out of eligible candidates, but there was no difference between the age-sex distributions of those who participated and those who didn't. |
Mainous AG, Zoorob RG, Kohrs FP et al sept 1996 USA | Children over 3 years and less than 18 years in. 3478 individuals seen on 5067 separate occasions in an ambulatory setting, outpatient or emergency room, with a diagnosis of tonsillopharyngitis, over 1 year. | survey | % of antibiotic use in encounters without a diagnostic test performed vs encounters with a test perfomed | 73% vs 68% P=0.001 | The study concludes that antibiotics were prescribed by analysing if a prescription was given by seeing whether antibiotics were recieved within 5 days. Some sore throat visits were coded tonsillopharyngitis and some streptococcal sore throat. Diagnostic testing was only performed in 22% of tonsillophayngitis diagnoses and 36% of the streptococcal sore throat encounters. |
As above in encounters coded as streptococcal sore throat | 67% vs 69% p=0.49 | ||||
McIsaac WJ, Kellner JD, Aufricht P et al 2004 Canada | 787 children and adults presenting with acute sore throat. Recommendations from 2 guidelines were compared with rapid testing alone, a clinical prediction rule (the modified Centor's score) and treatment for positive throat cultures only. Culture all was the gold standard | diagnostic study | Culture all | inappropriate antibiotic prescription 0% | this study only included adults and children with a modified Centor score of 2 or more, however most guidelines support the use of clinical scores to to exclude patients. The sensitivity of the rapid test was only 83%. The study was not able to assess the impact of higher or lower GABHS prevalence. |
Children-rapid test all, treat those with positive results, throat culture those with negative strep tests. Adults rapid test all, treat positive results, dont culture negative results | 0.6% | ||||
children-treat as above. Adults rapid test all with a centor score of 2 or 3 and treat if positive. Treat all adults with a centor score over 4 empirically. | 1.8% | ||||
treat children as above. test no adults and treat those with a centor score of 3 or 4 empirically | 18.9% | ||||
throat culture all with a centor score of 2 or 3.If score of 4 or more treat empirically. | 4.8% | ||||
rapid test on all children and adults, treat those with positive results without culture confirmation of negative results | 0.6% |