Author, date and country | Patient group | Study type (level of evidence) | Outcomes | Key results | Study Weaknesses |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Arafa M, et al. 1986. UK. | 101 patients with fifth metacarpal fractures with no rotational deformity. Early mobilisation with no dressing. | Observational. | Time until fit to work | 34 within 2 weeks, 48 within 4 weeks, 19 within 12 weeks | Uncontrolled. |
Patient satisfaction | 79 totally satisfied | ||||
McKerrell J, et al. 1987. Canada. | 40 of 63 consecutive patients with closed fractures of the fifth metacarpal neck. Various conservative (25) vs operative management (15). | Clinical trial. | Time off work | 23 (0-56) vs 58 (4-180) days | Not randomised, large variation in non-operative treatment. |
Angulation | 31 vs 6 degrees | ||||
Functional end result and grip strength | No difference | ||||
Ford DJ, et al. 1989. UK. | 62 consecutive patients with fractures of the fifth metacarpal neck. No active treatment. | Observational. | Time taken for movement to recover | Full flexion at 3 weeks. Full extension at 1 year | Uncontrolled. |
Range of movement of MCPJ5 | Nil at 1 year | ||||
Time taken for pain to resolve | 3 - 9 months | ||||
Length of time off work | 3 (0-12)weeks | ||||
Presence of deformity | 100% of whom 14% significant cosmetic | ||||
Maitra A and Sen B. 1990. UK. | 40 patients with fractures of the fifth metacarpal neck angulated more than 30 degrees. Treated by manipulation and immobilisation. | Observational. | Angulation at 0 and 3 weeks | Significant improvement at 3 weeks but less than immediately post manipulation. | Uncontrolled. Retrospective. Short follow-up. |
Konradsen L, et al. 1990. Denmark. | 100 patients with metacarpal injuries of which 58 patients had subcapital fractures of the second to fifth metacarpal. Full vs functional casting. | PRCT | Angulation at cast removal | Statistically better (P<0.05) reduction in angulation for functional cast after reduction and at cast removal. | Not blind. Fractures were not reduced at all in full cast group. No unmanipulated group. Differences were not clinically relevant. |
Theeuwen, et al. 1991. Netherlands. | 45 of 71 patients with isolated fractures of the neck of the fifth metacarpal. Treated according to clinical decision. Closed reduction (26) vs no active treatment (19) | Clinical trial. | Shortening at 1-5 years | No difference | Not randomised. Differences were not clinically relevant. |
Angulation at 1-5 years | Statistically significant improvement (10 degrees) - P <0.05. | ||||
Breddam M and Hansen TB. 1995. Denmark. | 36 of 43 patients with subcapital fractures of the fourth and fifth metacarpal neck without lateral or rotational deformity. Immediate mobilisation. | Observational. | Range of movement in the MCPJ (clinical) | Range of movement normal (compared with opposite hand) in 64% | No control group. Short follow-up period. |
Volar angulation at 4 weeks | Unchanged in 89% | ||||
Patient satisfaction | Full satisfaction in 86% | ||||
Braakman M. 1997. Netherlands. | 200 patients with primary fractures of the fourth and fifth metacarpals of which 63% were subcapital. Anatomical (< 5 degrees) reduction vs partial reduction. | Case-control. | Difference in residual angulation at follow-up at 4 weeks | No significant difference in subcapital fractures | |
Braakman M, et al. 1998. Netherlands. | 48 of 50 patients with fractures of the fifth metacarpal of which 35 were subcapital. Ulnar gutter plaster vs adjacent strapping of fourth and fifth fingers. | PRCT | Residual symptoms at 6 months | No difference | Subcapital and shaft fractures. |
Functional recovery | Significantly different (56% vs 100%) at 4 weeks. No difference at 6 months. |