Three Part Question
In [adults with hypotension] does the [Trendelenburg position] improve [hemodynamics]?
A 28 year old male with a gunshot wound to the leg presents to the emergency department in hypovolemic shock. Among other things, you place the patient in the Trendelenburg position, with the body tilted so that the feet is higher than the head. You wonder whether this position actually improves hemodynamics.
Medline and Embase databases searched via OvidSP interface in June 2010.
[shock.mp OR hypovol$.mp OR hypotensi$.mp] AND [trendelenburg.mp OR head-down tilt.mp] LIMIT to English language and humans.
Two hundred and ninety-four papers were found, of which five were considered relevant to the question
|Author, date and country
||Study type (level of evidence)
|Sing RF, et al,|
|Eight consecutive hypovolemic adults were studied. All patients were postoperative admissions to the surgical ICU||Non-randomized controlled trial||Oxygen Delivery (Supine vs. Trendelenburg)||No significant change||Small sample size. Two patients were given metoprolol and dobutamine for postoperative complications.|
|Cardiac Index (l/min/m2) ||No significant change|
|Mean Arterial Pressure by radial artery catheter||Increased from 64.9–75.6 mm Hg, p<0.05|
|Miyabe M et al,|
|40 Female patients undergoing major gynaecological surgery with spinal anaesthesia. Patients were put in head-tilt position for 10 min following spinal anaesthetic||Observational study||Systolic Blood Pressure (Severe hypotensive patients)||SBP decreased by 24% after the spinal block. There was a non-significant increase in the average blood pressure of the group to 22–24% below the initial level||No control group. Different population from patients presenting to emergency departments|
|Sibbald WJ, et al,|
|61 normotensive and 15 hypotensive patients with acute cardiac illness or sepsis||Non-randomized controlled trial||Mean Arterial Presure (Hypotensive Patients)||No significant increase||Small number of patients with the target condition|
|Cardiac Index (Hypotensive Patients)||No significant increase|
|Reuter DA, et al,|
|12 Ventilated patients with hypovolaemia suggested by trans-oesophageal echo were positioned 30° head-down for 15 min||Observational study||MAP and cardiac index as determined by invasive monitoring||No significant difference in either MAP or cardiac index on assuming head-down tilt. There was a significant drop in each on returning the patients to the supine position ||Small study with no control group|
|Taylor and Well,|
|11 Patients from a single hospital. 54 Patients had significant hypotension due to a variety of reasons, five patients were critically unwell but normotensive at the time ||Observational study||Arterial pressure and cardiac index were measured invasively using catheters during a 20 min period of head-down tilt||In six/seven patients with hypotension (one patient tested twice) the arterial pressure decreased. It increased in the other patient. No significant change in the normotensive patients|
No change in cardiac index on assuming head-tilt but non-significant increase on reverting to horizontal in all patients
|Small number of selected patients with different underlying aetiologies for their condition|
The Trendelenburg position was originally described by Freidrich Trendelenburg as a method of improving the surgical field view during laparotomy. It was suggested as a method of improving cardiac output in patients with shock during the First World War by Walter Cannon, although he later decided it was not beneficial. The theory was that gravity would aid the venous return of blood to the central circulation and improve cardiac output. Despite any evidence of benefit and the fact that its original propagator rescinded his recommendation, the idea has remained popular, perhaps because the idea appears logical in a purely mechanical sense. The Trendelenburg position is advocated for hypotensive patients secondary to a wide selection of drug overdoses on the UK Poisons Information Service website, and most first-aid texts advocate leg elevation for patients who have fainted.
Several studies were found that examined the cardiovascular effect of a downward head-tilt position in patients with a compromised vascular system. The studies all involved small numbers of patients who had hypotension due to a variety of aetiologies and all have some methodological flaws. The one thing that all of the included studies has in common is a failure to demonstrate any benefit of the Trendelenburg position on cardiac output. There is some suggestion that it may even have a detrimental effect apparent on returning the patient to a supine position.
MAP, mean arterial pressure; SBP, systolic blood pressure.
Clinical Bottom Line
There is no evidence of benefit in using the Trendelenburg position for patients with hypotension and this practice is not recommended.
- Sing RF, O'Hara D, Sawyer MAJ et al. Trendelenburg Position and Oxygen Transport in Hypovolemic Adults. Ann Emerg Med March 1994; 23:564-567.
- Miyabe M, Namiki A. The Effect of Head-down Tilt on Arterial Blood Pressure After Spinal Anesthesia Anesth Analg 1993;76:549-552.
- Sibbald WJ, Paterson NA, Holliday RL et al. The Trendelenburg Position: Hemodynamic Effects in Hypotensive and Normotensive Patients. Crit Care Med 1979;7:218-224.
- Reuter DA, Felbinger TW, Moerstedt, Kilger E et al. Trendelenburg Positioning After Cardiac Surgery: Effects on Intrathoracic Blood Volume Index and Cardiac Performance Eur J Anaesthesiol 2003;20:17-20.
- Taylor J. Weil MH. Failure of the trendelenburg position to improve circulation during clinical shock. Surg, Gynecol Obstet 1967;124:1005–10.